Routine use of ultrasound 24 hours before laparoscopic cholecystectomy can predict the need for intraoperative cholangiogram: results of a 12-month prospective audit.

A T Goodwin, J Tully, C Charlesworth, R I Swift, S J Chadwick
{"title":"Routine use of ultrasound 24 hours before laparoscopic cholecystectomy can predict the need for intraoperative cholangiogram: results of a 12-month prospective audit.","authors":"A T Goodwin,&nbsp;J Tully,&nbsp;C Charlesworth,&nbsp;R I Swift,&nbsp;S J Chadwick","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intraoperative cholangiograms and exploration of the common bile duct (CBD) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy are technically more demanding than during open cholecystectomy. This has led to many surgeons using a selective policy for cholangiography. In this study we prospectively assessed whether biliary ultrasound (CBD diameter > or = 6 mm) or one or more abnormal liver function tests (LFTs) performed in the 24 hours preoperatively could predict the need for cholangiography. Forty-five patients were studied (14 male, 31 female), mean age 47.8 years. All patients with one or both tests abnormal preoperatively (19 patients) underwent intraoperative cholangiograms. Seven CBD stones were identified (16%). There was no evidence of CBD stones in patients not undergoing cholangiography at a median follow-up of 18 months. In patients with stones, three underwent open CBD exploration, and four underwent endoscopic retrograde choledochopancreatography (ERCP) and sphincterotomy in the early postoperative period without complications. CBD diameter > or = 6 mm is a useful predictor of CBD stones. These may be treated successfully by postoperative ERCP.</p>","PeriodicalId":22312,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of clinical practice","volume":"51 3","pages":"140-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intraoperative cholangiograms and exploration of the common bile duct (CBD) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy are technically more demanding than during open cholecystectomy. This has led to many surgeons using a selective policy for cholangiography. In this study we prospectively assessed whether biliary ultrasound (CBD diameter > or = 6 mm) or one or more abnormal liver function tests (LFTs) performed in the 24 hours preoperatively could predict the need for cholangiography. Forty-five patients were studied (14 male, 31 female), mean age 47.8 years. All patients with one or both tests abnormal preoperatively (19 patients) underwent intraoperative cholangiograms. Seven CBD stones were identified (16%). There was no evidence of CBD stones in patients not undergoing cholangiography at a median follow-up of 18 months. In patients with stones, three underwent open CBD exploration, and four underwent endoscopic retrograde choledochopancreatography (ERCP) and sphincterotomy in the early postoperative period without complications. CBD diameter > or = 6 mm is a useful predictor of CBD stones. These may be treated successfully by postoperative ERCP.

腹腔镜胆囊切除术前24小时常规超声检查可以预测术中胆道造影的需要:一项12个月的前瞻性审计结果。
腹腔镜胆囊切除术中术中胆管造影和胆总管探查在技术上比开放胆囊切除术要求更高。这导致许多外科医生采用选择性的胆管造影策略。在这项研究中,我们前瞻性地评估术前24小时进行的胆道超声(CBD直径>或= 6mm)或一项或多项肝功能异常检查(LFTs)是否可以预测胆道造影的需要。45例患者(男14例,女31例),平均年龄47.8岁。术前一项或两项检查均异常的患者(19例)均行术中胆管造影。发现了7个CBD结石(16%)。在中位随访18个月时,未接受胆管造影的患者无CBD结石的证据。在结石患者中,3例接受了开放的CBD探查,4例在术后早期接受了内镜逆行胆总管造影术(ERCP)和括约肌切开术,无并发症。CBD直径>或= 6mm是CBD结石的有效预测指标。术后ERCP可成功治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信