Health education and antibiotic therapy in trachoma control.

S Resnikoff, F Peyramaure, C O Bagayogo, P Huguet
{"title":"Health education and antibiotic therapy in trachoma control.","authors":"S Resnikoff,&nbsp;F Peyramaure,&nbsp;C O Bagayogo,&nbsp;P Huguet","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to confirm whether the combination of a health education programme with a mass treatment campaign was able to improve the effectiveness of trachoma control. An open controlled clinical trial with a 2 x 2 factorial design was carried out. Four villages, matched for size and epidemiological, economic and social conditions, were included in the study. The first village received mass treatment with 1% oxytetracycline eye drops combined with a specific health education programme. The second village received only a health education programme. The third village received only mass treatment and the fourth village did not receive any intervention during the study (control village). 1810 subjects were enrolled of whom 76% were successfully followed for 6 months. The incidence of new cases ranged between 1.6% and 14.2%. In this study the combination of a health education programme with mass treatment failed to increase the cure rate. There was even a negative interaction (P = 0.03). The best results were obtained in the village where antibiotic treatment was used alone, both in terms of cure rate (82%) and reduction of C trachomatis transmission. These results suggest that the addition of a health education programme does not systematically improve the performances of a mass treatment campaign. The efficacy of this combination depends essentially on the capacity of the community to modify its hygiene behaviour.</p>","PeriodicalId":77361,"journal":{"name":"Revue internationale du trachome et de pathologie oculaire tropicale et subtropicale et de sante publique : organe de la Ligue contre le trachome avec la collaboration de l'International Organization against Trachoma et des organisation...","volume":"72 ","pages":"89-98, 101-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue internationale du trachome et de pathologie oculaire tropicale et subtropicale et de sante publique : organe de la Ligue contre le trachome avec la collaboration de l'International Organization against Trachoma et des organisation...","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to confirm whether the combination of a health education programme with a mass treatment campaign was able to improve the effectiveness of trachoma control. An open controlled clinical trial with a 2 x 2 factorial design was carried out. Four villages, matched for size and epidemiological, economic and social conditions, were included in the study. The first village received mass treatment with 1% oxytetracycline eye drops combined with a specific health education programme. The second village received only a health education programme. The third village received only mass treatment and the fourth village did not receive any intervention during the study (control village). 1810 subjects were enrolled of whom 76% were successfully followed for 6 months. The incidence of new cases ranged between 1.6% and 14.2%. In this study the combination of a health education programme with mass treatment failed to increase the cure rate. There was even a negative interaction (P = 0.03). The best results were obtained in the village where antibiotic treatment was used alone, both in terms of cure rate (82%) and reduction of C trachomatis transmission. These results suggest that the addition of a health education programme does not systematically improve the performances of a mass treatment campaign. The efficacy of this combination depends essentially on the capacity of the community to modify its hygiene behaviour.

沙眼控制中的健康教育和抗生素治疗。
本研究的目的是确认健康教育计划与大规模治疗运动相结合是否能够提高沙眼控制的有效性。进行了一项2 × 2因子设计的开放对照临床试验。研究包括四个村庄,它们的大小和流行病学、经济和社会条件相匹配。第一个村庄接受了1%土霉素滴眼液的大规模治疗,并结合了具体的健康教育方案。第二个村庄只接受健康教育方案。第三个村庄只接受了大规模治疗,第四个村庄在研究期间没有接受任何干预(对照村)。纳入1810名受试者,其中76%成功随访6个月。新发病例的发生率在1.6%至14.2%之间。在这项研究中,健康教育计划与大规模治疗相结合未能提高治愈率。甚至存在负交互作用(P = 0.03)。在治愈率(82%)和减少沙眼原体传播方面,单独使用抗生素治疗的村庄取得了最好的结果。这些结果表明,增加健康教育方案并不能系统地改善大规模治疗运动的效果。这种结合的效果主要取决于社区改变其卫生行为的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信