Right heart catheterization: is it effective?

New horizons (Baltimore, Md.) Pub Date : 1997-08-01
A F Connors
{"title":"Right heart catheterization: is it effective?","authors":"A F Connors","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To discuss the advantages of different methods of determining the effectiveness of healthcare interventions, to evaluate the basis for the assumption that right heart catheterization is effective, and to consider how right heart catheterization may fail to improve outcomes in some circumstances.</p><p><strong>Data source: </strong>Published English language literature on right heart catheterization and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We recently reported an association between the use of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients and increased risk of death. This finding is troubling and warrants future study. In this article I address the role of randomized controlled trials and observational studies in the evaluation of the effectiveness of healthcare interventions. I discuss the basis in the published literature for assuming that right heart catheterization improves outcomes. Finally I present a variety of problems with right heart catheterization which might allow this procedure, which logically should help patients, to fail to achieve a beneficial effect for some patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We must do appropriate prospective studies to determine who benefits from right heart catheterization and who does not. We owe our patients nothing less.</p>","PeriodicalId":79357,"journal":{"name":"New horizons (Baltimore, Md.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New horizons (Baltimore, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To discuss the advantages of different methods of determining the effectiveness of healthcare interventions, to evaluate the basis for the assumption that right heart catheterization is effective, and to consider how right heart catheterization may fail to improve outcomes in some circumstances.

Data source: Published English language literature on right heart catheterization and patient outcomes.

Discussion: We recently reported an association between the use of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients and increased risk of death. This finding is troubling and warrants future study. In this article I address the role of randomized controlled trials and observational studies in the evaluation of the effectiveness of healthcare interventions. I discuss the basis in the published literature for assuming that right heart catheterization improves outcomes. Finally I present a variety of problems with right heart catheterization which might allow this procedure, which logically should help patients, to fail to achieve a beneficial effect for some patients.

Conclusion: We must do appropriate prospective studies to determine who benefits from right heart catheterization and who does not. We owe our patients nothing less.

右心导管:有效吗?
目的:讨论确定医疗保健干预措施有效性的不同方法的优势,评估右心导管置入有效假设的基础,并考虑在某些情况下右心导管置入可能无法改善预后的原因。数据来源:已发表的关于右心导管插入术和患者预后的英文文献。讨论:我们最近报道了在危重病人的初始护理中使用右心导管与死亡风险增加之间的关联。这一发现令人不安,值得进一步研究。在本文中,我讨论了随机对照试验和观察性研究在评估医疗干预措施有效性中的作用。我在发表的文献中讨论了假设右心导管可改善预后的基础。最后,我提出了右心导管插入术的各种问题,这些问题可能会使这个程序在逻辑上应该帮助病人,但对一些病人却不能取得有益的效果。结论:我们必须做适当的前瞻性研究来确定谁受益于右心导管置入,谁没有。我们对病人的亏欠也仅此而已。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信