Antibacterial effects of amalgams on mutans streptococci in an in vitro biofilm test procedure.

Acta stomatologica Belgica Pub Date : 1996-06-01
L Netuschil, K G Vohrer, P Riethe, Z Kasloff, M Brecx
{"title":"Antibacterial effects of amalgams on mutans streptococci in an in vitro biofilm test procedure.","authors":"L Netuschil,&nbsp;K G Vohrer,&nbsp;P Riethe,&nbsp;Z Kasloff,&nbsp;M Brecx","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Conflicting data continue to be presented in the literature regarding the antibacterial potential of various amalgam alloy compositions. The aim of the present study was to compare the antibacterial effects of 4 different amalgam samples on mutans streptococci using two in vitro test procedures. Glass and bovine enamel served as negative controls. The first test, one commonly used, consisted of immersing freshly prepared disks of the six materials in culture broth inoculated with mutans streptococci. Optical density measurements of the broth served to evaluate bacterial growth. This was followed by a biofilm technique which provided more intimate contact between the bacteria and specimen surfaces. With the exception of one high-copper lathe-cut amalgam, the first test revealed no antibacterial potential of the samples whereas the second test with the biofilm design elucidated significant differences in antibacterial potential between the amalgam alloy compositions and the controls. The biofilm technique, used in an in vitro test procedure, reflects the conditions of the oral environment more accurately than conventional test designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":75420,"journal":{"name":"Acta stomatologica Belgica","volume":"93 2","pages":"73-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta stomatologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conflicting data continue to be presented in the literature regarding the antibacterial potential of various amalgam alloy compositions. The aim of the present study was to compare the antibacterial effects of 4 different amalgam samples on mutans streptococci using two in vitro test procedures. Glass and bovine enamel served as negative controls. The first test, one commonly used, consisted of immersing freshly prepared disks of the six materials in culture broth inoculated with mutans streptococci. Optical density measurements of the broth served to evaluate bacterial growth. This was followed by a biofilm technique which provided more intimate contact between the bacteria and specimen surfaces. With the exception of one high-copper lathe-cut amalgam, the first test revealed no antibacterial potential of the samples whereas the second test with the biofilm design elucidated significant differences in antibacterial potential between the amalgam alloy compositions and the controls. The biofilm technique, used in an in vitro test procedure, reflects the conditions of the oral environment more accurately than conventional test designs.

汞合金在体外生物膜试验程序中对变形链球菌的抗菌作用。
关于各种汞合金成分的抗菌潜力,文献中继续提出了相互矛盾的数据。本研究的目的是比较4种不同汞合金样品对变形链球菌的抑菌效果,采用两种体外试验程序。玻璃和牛牙釉质作为阴性对照。第一个试验是一种常用的试验,将新鲜制备的六种材料的圆盘浸泡在接种了变形链球菌的培养液中。光密度测量肉汤用于评估细菌生长。接下来是生物膜技术,它提供了细菌和标本表面之间更密切的接触。除一种高铜车切银汞合金外,第一次测试显示样品没有抗菌潜力,而生物膜设计的第二次测试表明银汞合金成分与对照组之间的抗菌潜力存在显著差异。生物膜技术用于体外测试程序,比传统测试设计更准确地反映口腔环境的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信