Pad weighing tests: the best way to quantify urine loss in patients with incontinence.

H Siltberg, A Victor, G Larsson
{"title":"Pad weighing tests: the best way to quantify urine loss in patients with incontinence.","authors":"H Siltberg,&nbsp;A Victor,&nbsp;G Larsson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article reviews the literature on pad weighing tests composed to measure urinary incontinence. The tests can be divided into short-term tests (one to two hours) performed in a clinic or laboratory, or long-term tests (12 to 48 hours) performed by the patient at home. The short-term tests, apart from practical disadvantages, have low negative predictive value and require retrograde filling of the bladder to reach acceptable reproducibility. The long-term tests have practical advantages, better sensitivity and acceptable reproducibility. Pad weighing tests have no value for the purpose of differential diagnosis. The validity of the long-term test as a measure of the symptom of urinary incontinence is obvious whereas it is unclear what the short-term test measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":75400,"journal":{"name":"Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. Supplement","volume":"166 ","pages":"28-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article reviews the literature on pad weighing tests composed to measure urinary incontinence. The tests can be divided into short-term tests (one to two hours) performed in a clinic or laboratory, or long-term tests (12 to 48 hours) performed by the patient at home. The short-term tests, apart from practical disadvantages, have low negative predictive value and require retrograde filling of the bladder to reach acceptable reproducibility. The long-term tests have practical advantages, better sensitivity and acceptable reproducibility. Pad weighing tests have no value for the purpose of differential diagnosis. The validity of the long-term test as a measure of the symptom of urinary incontinence is obvious whereas it is unclear what the short-term test measures.

尿垫称重试验:量化尿失禁患者尿量的最佳方法。
本文综述了尿垫称重试验用于测量尿失禁的文献。这些检查可分为在诊所或实验室进行的短期检查(1至2小时),或由患者在家中进行的长期检查(12至48小时)。短期试验除实际缺点外,阴性预测值低,需要逆行膀胱填充才能达到可接受的再现性。长期试验具有实用性强、灵敏度高、重复性好等优点。尿垫称重试验对鉴别诊断没有价值。长期测试作为尿失禁症状测量的有效性是显而易见的,而短期测试测量的是不清楚的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信