Body proportions and early neonatal morbidity in small-for-gestational-age infants of successive births.

T Vik, T Markestad, G Ahlsten, M Gebre-Medhin, G Jacobsen, H J Hoffman, L S Bakketeig
{"title":"Body proportions and early neonatal morbidity in small-for-gestational-age infants of successive births.","authors":"T Vik,&nbsp;T Markestad,&nbsp;G Ahlsten,&nbsp;M Gebre-Medhin,&nbsp;G Jacobsen,&nbsp;H J Hoffman,&nbsp;L S Bakketeig","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We wanted to examine if infants who were small for gestational age (SGA) at term had increased perinatal mortality or morbidity compared to non-SGA infants, and if this could be related to the infant's body proportions, or to whether the mother previously had delivered a low-birthweight infant (\"repeater\") or not (\"non-repeater\").</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From a cohort of 5722 para 1 and para 2 women, we compared perinatal mortality in 541 SGA (birthweight < 10th percentile) and 4737 non-SGA infants. From the same cohort, early neonatal morbidity was studied in 368 SGA and 462 control infants without congenital malformations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SGA infants had a 6.4 (95% CI: 2.6-15.7) higher risk of perinatal death than controls, but when infants who died with congenital malformations were excluded, this risk was not significantly increased. SGA infants were more often transferred to an intensive care unit than controls (1.7, 95% CI: 1.0-2.9). Among SGA births, infants with asymmetric body proportions (i.e. low ponderal index) more often had symptoms in the neonatal period (RR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.4-4.3) and were more often transferred to an intensive care unit (3.4; 95% CI: 1.6-7.4) than symmetric SGA infants, whereas there were no differences between SGA infants of repeaters and non-repeaters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that SGA infants had higher perinatal mortality than controls, but this was due to a higher prevalence of congenital malformations. Among SGA infants without malformations, our results indicated increased neonatal morbidity in infants with asymmetric body proportions.</p>","PeriodicalId":75400,"journal":{"name":"Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. Supplement","volume":"165 ","pages":"76-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We wanted to examine if infants who were small for gestational age (SGA) at term had increased perinatal mortality or morbidity compared to non-SGA infants, and if this could be related to the infant's body proportions, or to whether the mother previously had delivered a low-birthweight infant ("repeater") or not ("non-repeater").

Methods: From a cohort of 5722 para 1 and para 2 women, we compared perinatal mortality in 541 SGA (birthweight < 10th percentile) and 4737 non-SGA infants. From the same cohort, early neonatal morbidity was studied in 368 SGA and 462 control infants without congenital malformations.

Results: SGA infants had a 6.4 (95% CI: 2.6-15.7) higher risk of perinatal death than controls, but when infants who died with congenital malformations were excluded, this risk was not significantly increased. SGA infants were more often transferred to an intensive care unit than controls (1.7, 95% CI: 1.0-2.9). Among SGA births, infants with asymmetric body proportions (i.e. low ponderal index) more often had symptoms in the neonatal period (RR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.4-4.3) and were more often transferred to an intensive care unit (3.4; 95% CI: 1.6-7.4) than symmetric SGA infants, whereas there were no differences between SGA infants of repeaters and non-repeaters.

Conclusions: We found that SGA infants had higher perinatal mortality than controls, but this was due to a higher prevalence of congenital malformations. Among SGA infants without malformations, our results indicated increased neonatal morbidity in infants with asymmetric body proportions.

连续出生的小胎龄婴儿的身体比例和早期新生儿发病率。
背景:我们想研究足月小胎龄婴儿(SGA)是否比非SGA婴儿有更高的围产期死亡率或发病率,以及这是否与婴儿的身体比例有关,或者是否与母亲以前是否生过低出生体重婴儿(“重复者”)有关。方法:从5722名第1段和第2段妇女队列中,我们比较了541名SGA(出生体重< 10百分位)和4737名非SGA婴儿的围产期死亡率。从同一队列中,研究了368例SGA和462例无先天性畸形的对照婴儿的早期新生儿发病率。结果:SGA婴儿的围产期死亡风险比对照组高6.4 (95% CI: 2.6-15.7),但当排除先天性畸形死亡的婴儿时,这种风险没有显著增加。SGA婴儿比对照组更常转入重症监护病房(1.7,95% CI: 1.0-2.9)。在SGA出生的婴儿中,身体比例不对称(即低ponderal指数)的婴儿更常在新生儿期出现症状(RR: 2.5;95% CI: 1.4-4.3),并且更经常被转移到重症监护病房(3.4;95% CI: 1.6-7.4)高于对称SGA婴儿,而重复者和非重复者的SGA婴儿之间无差异。结论:我们发现SGA婴儿的围产期死亡率高于对照组,但这是由于先天性畸形的患病率较高。在没有畸形的SGA婴儿中,我们的结果表明身体比例不对称的婴儿的新生儿发病率增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信