Biologically based validation of PC electrophysiology data collection systems utilizing the Good Automated Laboratory Practices.

R D Jones, T A Weyrauch, S R Bailey, C A Halder
{"title":"Biologically based validation of PC electrophysiology data collection systems utilizing the Good Automated Laboratory Practices.","authors":"R D Jones,&nbsp;T A Weyrauch,&nbsp;S R Bailey,&nbsp;C A Halder","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since there was a scientific need to conduct electrophysiology measurements to detect possible ocular (electroretinography, ERG), central neurotoxic (quantitative electroencephalography, qEEG), and cardiac (electrocardiography, ECG) effects in animals used in certain regulatory studies, the acquisition of suitable automated PC software systems were required. This article describes the process by which these systems were validated to ensure that they met the scientific requirements, while also addressing the principles of Good Automated Laboratory Practices (GALP). After a thorough search of existing commercial packages, a plan was developed specific for each PC-based collection system selected for evaluation. The common elements of each plan included consideration of both scientific and GALP elements, such as necessary biological response variables, raw data acquisition and identification, acceptance criteria, security, protection, storage media, data integrity, audit requirements and standard operating procedures. The authors' approach to validation for each electrophysiology system was to determine scientific needs for accuracy, precision, and detection limit of biological effects concurrent with GALP requirements. The selected software systems were employed in separate scientific GLP studies conducted in dogs, rats, and mini-pigs to demonstrate the ability to detect cholinesterase effects due to multiple infusions of physostigmine, based on parallel measurement of cholinesterase biomarkers. Since the systems were designed for human usage, certain adaptations were necessary. A critical assumption to be tested was the ability of the system's algorithms to adequately capture and assimilate the data in an accurate fashion. Concomitantly, the related GALP needs, such as data integrity, security, CD-ROM archive, and personnel training requirements were evaluated, implemented, and defined to accommodate the application and process needs. The biological approach to validation of these PC-based electrophysiology systems met the necessary scientific acceptance criteria as well as compliance requirements in order to be used in regulatory studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":77339,"journal":{"name":"Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)","volume":"5 1","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since there was a scientific need to conduct electrophysiology measurements to detect possible ocular (electroretinography, ERG), central neurotoxic (quantitative electroencephalography, qEEG), and cardiac (electrocardiography, ECG) effects in animals used in certain regulatory studies, the acquisition of suitable automated PC software systems were required. This article describes the process by which these systems were validated to ensure that they met the scientific requirements, while also addressing the principles of Good Automated Laboratory Practices (GALP). After a thorough search of existing commercial packages, a plan was developed specific for each PC-based collection system selected for evaluation. The common elements of each plan included consideration of both scientific and GALP elements, such as necessary biological response variables, raw data acquisition and identification, acceptance criteria, security, protection, storage media, data integrity, audit requirements and standard operating procedures. The authors' approach to validation for each electrophysiology system was to determine scientific needs for accuracy, precision, and detection limit of biological effects concurrent with GALP requirements. The selected software systems were employed in separate scientific GLP studies conducted in dogs, rats, and mini-pigs to demonstrate the ability to detect cholinesterase effects due to multiple infusions of physostigmine, based on parallel measurement of cholinesterase biomarkers. Since the systems were designed for human usage, certain adaptations were necessary. A critical assumption to be tested was the ability of the system's algorithms to adequately capture and assimilate the data in an accurate fashion. Concomitantly, the related GALP needs, such as data integrity, security, CD-ROM archive, and personnel training requirements were evaluated, implemented, and defined to accommodate the application and process needs. The biological approach to validation of these PC-based electrophysiology systems met the necessary scientific acceptance criteria as well as compliance requirements in order to be used in regulatory studies.

基于生物学的PC电生理数据收集系统的验证,利用良好的自动化实验室规范。
由于科学需要进行电生理测量,以检测在某些调节研究中使用的动物可能的眼部(视网膜电图,ERG)、中枢神经毒性(定量脑电图,qEEG)和心脏(心电图,ECG)影响,因此需要获得合适的自动化PC软件系统。本文描述了验证这些系统以确保它们满足科学需求的过程,同时也介绍了良好自动化实验室实践(GALP)的原则。在对现有的商业包装进行了彻底的搜索之后,针对每个选择进行评估的基于个人电脑的收集系统制定了具体的计划。每个计划的共同要素包括考虑科学和GALP要素,如必要的生物反应变量、原始数据采集和识别、接受标准、安全性、保护、存储介质、数据完整性、审计要求和标准操作程序。作者验证每个电生理系统的方法是确定准确性、精密度和生物效应检测限的科学需求,同时满足GALP的要求。所选择的软件系统被用于在狗、大鼠和小型猪中进行的单独的GLP科学研究中,以证明基于平行测量胆碱酯酶生物标志物,多次输注肉毒杆菌碱检测胆碱酯酶效应的能力。由于这些系统是为人类使用而设计的,因此有必要进行一些调整。需要测试的一个关键假设是系统算法以准确的方式充分捕获和吸收数据的能力。与此同时,相关的GALP需求,如数据完整性、安全性、CD-ROM存档和人员培训需求被评估、实现和定义,以适应应用程序和过程需求。验证这些基于pc的电生理系统的生物学方法符合必要的科学接受标准以及用于监管研究的合规要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信