An empirical study of the psychodynamics of suicide: A preliminary report

Susan E. Chance M.A., Susan L. Reviere M.A., James H. Rogers Ph.D., Mark E. James M.D., Salley Jessee M.D., Lisseth Rojas M.A., Carrie A. Hatcher B.A., Nadine J. Kaslow Ph.D.
{"title":"An empirical study of the psychodynamics of suicide: A preliminary report","authors":"Susan E. Chance M.A.,&nbsp;Susan L. Reviere M.A.,&nbsp;James H. Rogers Ph.D.,&nbsp;Mark E. James M.D.,&nbsp;Salley Jessee M.D.,&nbsp;Lisseth Rojas M.A.,&nbsp;Carrie A. Hatcher B.A.,&nbsp;Nadine J. Kaslow Ph.D.","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1522-7162(1996)4:2<89::AID-DEPR9>3.0.CO;2-A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Preliminary results from a study of psychodynamic constructs are presented based on data from inpatients following a suicide attempt. The study examines the association between four psychodynamic constructs, severity of suicidal intent, and severity of depressive symptomatology in a sample of hospitalized suicide attempters. Higher levels of suicidal intent were associated with less differentiated self and object representations and less emotional investment in relationships. More severe depressive symptoms in suicide attempters were correlated with more self-targeted anger; less eternally directed anger, higher levels of shame and guilt, more affectively negative views of relationships, greater use of maladaptive and self-sacrificing defenses, and more impaired reality testing. These findings offer some preliminary empirical support for the validity of psychodynamic theories of suicidal behavior. Depression 4:89–91 (1996). © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</p>","PeriodicalId":11179,"journal":{"name":"Depression","volume":"4 2","pages":"89-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1522-7162(1996)4:2<89::AID-DEPR9>3.0.CO;2-A","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291522-7162%281996%294%3A2%3C89%3A%3AAID-DEPR9%3E3.0.CO%3B2-A","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Preliminary results from a study of psychodynamic constructs are presented based on data from inpatients following a suicide attempt. The study examines the association between four psychodynamic constructs, severity of suicidal intent, and severity of depressive symptomatology in a sample of hospitalized suicide attempters. Higher levels of suicidal intent were associated with less differentiated self and object representations and less emotional investment in relationships. More severe depressive symptoms in suicide attempters were correlated with more self-targeted anger; less eternally directed anger, higher levels of shame and guilt, more affectively negative views of relationships, greater use of maladaptive and self-sacrificing defenses, and more impaired reality testing. These findings offer some preliminary empirical support for the validity of psychodynamic theories of suicidal behavior. Depression 4:89–91 (1996). © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

自杀心理动力学的实证研究:初步报告
心理动力学构念研究的初步结果基于自杀未遂住院病人的数据。该研究在住院自杀未遂者样本中检验了四种心理动力学构念、自杀意图的严重程度和抑郁症状的严重程度之间的关系。较高水平的自杀意图与较少分化的自我和客体表征以及较少的人际关系情感投入相关。自杀未遂者的抑郁症状越严重,其自我针对性愤怒程度越高;更少的永恒的愤怒,更高层次的羞耻和内疚,对人际关系更消极的看法,更多地使用适应不良和自我牺牲的防御,以及更多受损的现实测试。这些发现为自杀行为的心理动力学理论的有效性提供了一些初步的实证支持。抑郁症:89 - 91(1996)。©1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信