Equivalence of asthma control with new CFC-free formulation HFA-134a beclomethasone dipropionate and CFC-beclomethasone dipropionate.

R Dahl, N Ringdal, S M Ward, P Stampone, D Donnell
{"title":"Equivalence of asthma control with new CFC-free formulation HFA-134a beclomethasone dipropionate and CFC-beclomethasone dipropionate.","authors":"R Dahl,&nbsp;N Ringdal,&nbsp;S M Ward,&nbsp;P Stampone,&nbsp;D Donnell","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study was designed to test for equivalence of asthma control between a new aerosol formulation of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) incorporating a chlorofluorocarbon-(CFC) free, hydrofluoroalkane propellant (HFA-134a) and the conventional beclomethasone aerosol formulated in CFC propellants. Sixty-eight asthmatic patients entered an eight-week, randomised, double-blind crossover study. All patients, previously stabilised on BDP, were randomised to receive the same dose of BDP from each of the study treatments. Statistically significant equivalence was demonstrated between HFA-BDP and CFC-BDP for asthma control parameters: FEV1, morning and evening PEF, sleep disturbance, wheeze and cough, morning breathlessness and bronchodilator use. Such equivalence was also demonstrated for safety parameters. To conclude, it has been demonstrated that HFA-BDP achieves a level of asthma control that is clinically and statistically equivalent to CFC-BDP in terms of efficacy and safety, at total daily doses ranging from 200 micrograms to 600 micrograms in asthma patients previously stabilised on inhaled CFC-BDP.</p>","PeriodicalId":22312,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of clinical practice","volume":"51 1","pages":"11-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study was designed to test for equivalence of asthma control between a new aerosol formulation of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) incorporating a chlorofluorocarbon-(CFC) free, hydrofluoroalkane propellant (HFA-134a) and the conventional beclomethasone aerosol formulated in CFC propellants. Sixty-eight asthmatic patients entered an eight-week, randomised, double-blind crossover study. All patients, previously stabilised on BDP, were randomised to receive the same dose of BDP from each of the study treatments. Statistically significant equivalence was demonstrated between HFA-BDP and CFC-BDP for asthma control parameters: FEV1, morning and evening PEF, sleep disturbance, wheeze and cough, morning breathlessness and bronchodilator use. Such equivalence was also demonstrated for safety parameters. To conclude, it has been demonstrated that HFA-BDP achieves a level of asthma control that is clinically and statistically equivalent to CFC-BDP in terms of efficacy and safety, at total daily doses ranging from 200 micrograms to 600 micrograms in asthma patients previously stabilised on inhaled CFC-BDP.

新型无氟氯烃制剂HFA-134a二丙酸倍氯米松与cfc -二丙酸倍氯米松控制哮喘的等效性
该研究旨在测试含有不含氯氟烃(CFC)的氢氟烷烃推进剂(HFA-134a)的新型二丙酸倍氯米松(BDP)气雾剂配方与含有CFC推进剂的传统倍氯米松气雾剂配方之间的哮喘控制等效性。68名哮喘患者进入了一项为期8周的随机双盲交叉研究。所有先前在BDP上稳定的患者被随机分配接受来自每种研究治疗的相同剂量的BDP。HFA-BDP和CFC-BDP在哮喘控制参数:FEV1、早晚PEF、睡眠障碍、喘息和咳嗽、早晨呼吸困难和支气管扩张剂使用方面具有统计学意义的等效性。这种等效性也证明了安全参数。总之,已经证明,HFA-BDP达到的哮喘控制水平在临床和统计上与CFC-BDP的有效性和安全性相当,在以前吸入CFC-BDP稳定的哮喘患者中,总日剂量为200微克至600微克。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信