MA, MBBChir, MRCOG Anthony Davies (Clinical Research Fellow), BSc, MD, MRCOG Adam L. Magos (Consultant Obstetrician and Gynecologist)
{"title":"4 Indications and alternatives to hysterectomy","authors":"MA, MBBChir, MRCOG Anthony Davies (Clinical Research Fellow), BSc, MD, MRCOG Adam L. Magos (Consultant Obstetrician and Gynecologist)","doi":"10.1016/S0950-3552(97)80050-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hysterectomy is the commonest major operation performed by gynaecologists and is the definitive cure for many of it's indications which include dysfunctional uterine bleeding, fibroids, utero-vaginal prolapse, endometriosis and adenomyosis, pelvic inflammatory disease, pelvic pain, gynaecological cancers and obstetric complications. It is a successful operation in terms of relieving women of their presenting symptoms and high levels of satisfaction are reported by patients. However, it has a high risk of complications, involves a prolonged convalescence, is expensive and to some women represents a loss of femininity. It should only be employed after trying conservative treatments first if appropriate. If this fails, currently only endometrial ablation and myomectomy are valid alternatives to hysterectomy. If ultimately hysterectomy is required, there is considerable evidence that patient care can be improved by increasing the proportion of operations that are done vaginally and laparoscopically and decreasing the number of laparotomies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77031,"journal":{"name":"Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology","volume":"11 1","pages":"Pages 61-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-3552(97)80050-8","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950355297800508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27
Abstract
Hysterectomy is the commonest major operation performed by gynaecologists and is the definitive cure for many of it's indications which include dysfunctional uterine bleeding, fibroids, utero-vaginal prolapse, endometriosis and adenomyosis, pelvic inflammatory disease, pelvic pain, gynaecological cancers and obstetric complications. It is a successful operation in terms of relieving women of their presenting symptoms and high levels of satisfaction are reported by patients. However, it has a high risk of complications, involves a prolonged convalescence, is expensive and to some women represents a loss of femininity. It should only be employed after trying conservative treatments first if appropriate. If this fails, currently only endometrial ablation and myomectomy are valid alternatives to hysterectomy. If ultimately hysterectomy is required, there is considerable evidence that patient care can be improved by increasing the proportion of operations that are done vaginally and laparoscopically and decreasing the number of laparotomies.