Stereotactic large-gauge core biopsy: its role in the diagnosis of non-palpable mammographic abnormalities presenting to a screening service.

Australasian radiology Pub Date : 1997-05-01
S Sutton, J E Dahlstrom, S Jain
{"title":"Stereotactic large-gauge core biopsy: its role in the diagnosis of non-palpable mammographic abnormalities presenting to a screening service.","authors":"S Sutton,&nbsp;J E Dahlstrom,&nbsp;S Jain","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A retrospective study of large-gauge core biopsy (LGCB) of 206 non-palpable mammographic abnormalities detected at routine screening in a community-based clinic accredited with the Australian National Program for the Early Detection of Breast cancer, was performed to ascertain the role of LGCB as an alternative to diagnostic surgical biopsy within such a programme. Of the 51 malignancies diagnosed by LGCB and proceeding to treatment, no false-positives were found and agreement as to the presence, or otherwise, of invasion between core and open biopsy was 95%. Once malignancy was established by LGCB, one-stage treatment was possible in 74.5% of cases. A total of 114 lesions were considered to be benign and returned to routine screening. One interval cancer subsequently developed in this group. Incongruity between the pathological diagnosis from core biopsy and the mammographic image occurred in 29 cases, representing potential mistargeting in 14.1% of cases. Four cancers were discovered in this group when the patients subsequently proceeded to surgical biopsy, making an overall false-negative rate of 2.4%. No core biopsy sample was considered inadequate for pathological assessment and no lesion proved inaccessible to targeting. There was no long-term morbidity. We believe that LGCB is a safe, reliable and cheaper alternative to diagnostic surgical biopsy, but a close correlation of pathology and mammography is required to avoid the erroneous return of women to routine recall.</p>","PeriodicalId":75572,"journal":{"name":"Australasian radiology","volume":"41 2","pages":"103-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A retrospective study of large-gauge core biopsy (LGCB) of 206 non-palpable mammographic abnormalities detected at routine screening in a community-based clinic accredited with the Australian National Program for the Early Detection of Breast cancer, was performed to ascertain the role of LGCB as an alternative to diagnostic surgical biopsy within such a programme. Of the 51 malignancies diagnosed by LGCB and proceeding to treatment, no false-positives were found and agreement as to the presence, or otherwise, of invasion between core and open biopsy was 95%. Once malignancy was established by LGCB, one-stage treatment was possible in 74.5% of cases. A total of 114 lesions were considered to be benign and returned to routine screening. One interval cancer subsequently developed in this group. Incongruity between the pathological diagnosis from core biopsy and the mammographic image occurred in 29 cases, representing potential mistargeting in 14.1% of cases. Four cancers were discovered in this group when the patients subsequently proceeded to surgical biopsy, making an overall false-negative rate of 2.4%. No core biopsy sample was considered inadequate for pathological assessment and no lesion proved inaccessible to targeting. There was no long-term morbidity. We believe that LGCB is a safe, reliable and cheaper alternative to diagnostic surgical biopsy, but a close correlation of pathology and mammography is required to avoid the erroneous return of women to routine recall.

立体定向大口径核心活检:其在筛查服务中诊断不可触及的乳房x线摄影异常的作用。
在澳大利亚国家乳腺癌早期检测项目认可的社区诊所,对常规筛查中发现的206例不可触及的乳房x线摄影异常进行了大尺度核心活检(LGCB)的回顾性研究,以确定LGCB作为该项目中诊断性手术活检的替代方法的作用。在51例经LGCB诊断并进行治疗的恶性肿瘤中,没有发现假阳性,核心活检和开放活检之间存在或其他侵犯的一致性为95%。一旦恶性肿瘤由LGCB确定,74.5%的病例可以进行一期治疗。共有114个病变被认为是良性的,并恢复常规筛查。这一组随后出现了一例间隔期癌症。29例核心活检病理诊断与乳腺x线影像不一致,14.1%的病例可能存在误定位。当患者随后进行手术活检时,该组中发现了4例癌症,总假阴性率为2.4%。没有核心活检样本被认为不足以进行病理评估,也没有病变被证明无法靶向。没有长期发病率。我们认为LGCB是一种安全、可靠、廉价的手术活检诊断方法,但需要将病理和乳房x光检查密切相关,以避免妇女错误地返回常规回忆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信