Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal lesions: comparison of three fat-saturation pulse sequences.

Australasian radiology Pub Date : 1997-05-01
M H Pui, P S Goh, H F Choo, E C Fok
{"title":"Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal lesions: comparison of three fat-saturation pulse sequences.","authors":"M H Pui,&nbsp;P S Goh,&nbsp;H F Choo,&nbsp;E C Fok","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fat-saturation (FS) pulse sequences can improve the detection of musculoskeletal lesions. We prospectively compared contrast-enhanced T1-weighted FS spin-echo (SE) images, T2-weighted FS fast spin-echo (FSE) images and inversion recovery (IR) FSE images to determine if any of these three pulse sequences is superior for depicting bone marrow and soft tissue lesions. T1-weighted FS-SE images (400-680/10-20 [TR/TE]) after intravenous injection of gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), T2-weighted FS-FSE (2400-4200/96-112) and IR-FSE (3700-6000/12-14/170 [TR/TE/TI]) images were obtained with a 1.5-T magnet system in 35 patients. The visibility, margination and extent of 37 bone marrow and 67 soft tissue lesions, image uniformity, susceptibility and motion artefacts were qualitatively analysed by four radiologists. The number and size of lesions detected, the mean lesion signal-to-noise ration (S/N) and contrast-to-noise ratio (C/N) were also statistically compared. More bone and soft-tissue lesions were detected on the IR-FSE and T2-weighted FS-FSE than the T1-weighted FS-SE images. The IR-FSE images were significantly better than the T2-weighted FS-FSE and T1-weighted FS-SE images for bone marrow lesions conspicuity (P < 0.01). The soft-tissue lesions were also more conspicuous on the IR-FSE and T2-weighted FS-FSE images than on the T1-weighted FS-SE images (P < 0.005). The lesion extent and image quality were similar on all three sequences while motion artefacts were most severe on the IR-FSE and least severe on the T1-weighted FS-SE images (P < 0.001). Fat saturation was maximal on the IR-FSE images, resulting in a significantly higher mean C/N of bone marrow lesions. The mean C/N of soft-tissue lesions was higher on the T2-weighted FS-FSE images although the differences were not significant. The T2-weighted FS-FSE and IR-FSE sequences are superior to the contrast-enhanced T1-weighted FS-SE sequence for depicting musculoskeletal lesions. Bone marrow lesion conspicuity is greater on the IR-FSE images, with comparable scan time and image quality but more motion artifacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":75572,"journal":{"name":"Australasian radiology","volume":"41 2","pages":"99-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fat-saturation (FS) pulse sequences can improve the detection of musculoskeletal lesions. We prospectively compared contrast-enhanced T1-weighted FS spin-echo (SE) images, T2-weighted FS fast spin-echo (FSE) images and inversion recovery (IR) FSE images to determine if any of these three pulse sequences is superior for depicting bone marrow and soft tissue lesions. T1-weighted FS-SE images (400-680/10-20 [TR/TE]) after intravenous injection of gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), T2-weighted FS-FSE (2400-4200/96-112) and IR-FSE (3700-6000/12-14/170 [TR/TE/TI]) images were obtained with a 1.5-T magnet system in 35 patients. The visibility, margination and extent of 37 bone marrow and 67 soft tissue lesions, image uniformity, susceptibility and motion artefacts were qualitatively analysed by four radiologists. The number and size of lesions detected, the mean lesion signal-to-noise ration (S/N) and contrast-to-noise ratio (C/N) were also statistically compared. More bone and soft-tissue lesions were detected on the IR-FSE and T2-weighted FS-FSE than the T1-weighted FS-SE images. The IR-FSE images were significantly better than the T2-weighted FS-FSE and T1-weighted FS-SE images for bone marrow lesions conspicuity (P < 0.01). The soft-tissue lesions were also more conspicuous on the IR-FSE and T2-weighted FS-FSE images than on the T1-weighted FS-SE images (P < 0.005). The lesion extent and image quality were similar on all three sequences while motion artefacts were most severe on the IR-FSE and least severe on the T1-weighted FS-SE images (P < 0.001). Fat saturation was maximal on the IR-FSE images, resulting in a significantly higher mean C/N of bone marrow lesions. The mean C/N of soft-tissue lesions was higher on the T2-weighted FS-FSE images although the differences were not significant. The T2-weighted FS-FSE and IR-FSE sequences are superior to the contrast-enhanced T1-weighted FS-SE sequence for depicting musculoskeletal lesions. Bone marrow lesion conspicuity is greater on the IR-FSE images, with comparable scan time and image quality but more motion artifacts.

肌肉骨骼病变的磁共振成像:三种脂肪饱和脉冲序列的比较。
脂肪饱和度(FS)脉冲序列可以提高肌肉骨骼病变的检测。我们前瞻性地比较了对比增强t1加权FS自旋回波(SE)图像、t2加权FS快速自旋回波(FSE)图像和反演恢复(IR) FSE图像,以确定这三种脉冲序列中是否有任何一种更适合描绘骨髓和软组织病变。35例患者静脉注射钆-二乙烯三胺五乙酸(DTPA)后获得t1加权FS-SE图像(400-680/10-20 [TR/TE]), t2加权FS-FSE图像(2400-4200/96-112)和IR-FSE图像(3700-6000/12-14/170 [TR/TE/TI])。由4名放射科医师对37个骨髓和67个软组织病变的可见性、边缘和范围、图像均匀性、敏感性和运动伪影进行定性分析。并对检测到的病灶数量、大小、病灶平均信噪比(S/N)、对比噪比(C/N)进行统计学比较。IR-FSE和t2加权FS-FSE比t1加权FS-SE检测到更多的骨骼和软组织病变。IR-FSE图像对骨髓病变的显著性优于t2加权FS-FSE和t1加权FS-SE图像(P < 0.01)。软组织病变在IR-FSE和t2加权FS-FSE上也比在t1加权FS-SE上更明显(P < 0.005)。三个序列的病变程度和图像质量相似,而运动伪影在IR-FSE图像上最严重,在t1加权FS-SE图像上最不严重(P < 0.001)。在IR-FSE图像上脂肪饱和度最大,导致骨髓病变的平均C/N明显较高。软组织病变的平均C/N在t2加权FS-FSE图像上较高,但差异无统计学意义。t2加权FS-FSE和IR-FSE序列在描绘肌肉骨骼病变方面优于对比增强的t1加权FS-SE序列。骨髓病变在IR-FSE图像上更明显,扫描时间和图像质量相当,但运动伪影更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信