Research on CPR: reordering priorities.

New horizons (Baltimore, Md.) Pub Date : 1997-05-01
M H Weil
{"title":"Research on CPR: reordering priorities.","authors":"M H Weil","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The \"ABCs\" of CPR, i.e., airway, breathing, and circulation, represent the sequence of interventions currently advised and taught to providers of both basic life support (BLS) and advanced life support (ALS) by the American Heart Association. Nevertheless, in the settings of suspected or confirmed ventricular fibrillation, the ABCs may be deferred such that external electrical countershock(s) take(s) precedence. However, efforts to restore circulation by chest compression (or alternative mechanical means) remain the lowest of the three priorities for both BLS and ALS as presently prescribed. This ordering of priorities is based largely on the consensus rather than objective experimental or clinical evidence of improved outcomes. During the last 5 yrs, both clinical and experimental studies demonstrated that the A and B of these ABCs, and specifically positive-pressure ventilation, may not be essential during the initial 6 to 12 mins of CPR under conditions of sudden dysrhythmic cardiac arrest and in the absence of asphyxia. Recent studies further suggested that either or both precordial compression and spontaneous gasping may of itself generate sufficient alveolar ventilation during the initial 6 mins of CPR. Defibrillation now emerges as the highest priority. Automated defibrillators have a pivotal role. The need for objective controlled research, including experience with devices in clinical settings and technical improvements of operation, are essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":79357,"journal":{"name":"New horizons (Baltimore, Md.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New horizons (Baltimore, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The "ABCs" of CPR, i.e., airway, breathing, and circulation, represent the sequence of interventions currently advised and taught to providers of both basic life support (BLS) and advanced life support (ALS) by the American Heart Association. Nevertheless, in the settings of suspected or confirmed ventricular fibrillation, the ABCs may be deferred such that external electrical countershock(s) take(s) precedence. However, efforts to restore circulation by chest compression (or alternative mechanical means) remain the lowest of the three priorities for both BLS and ALS as presently prescribed. This ordering of priorities is based largely on the consensus rather than objective experimental or clinical evidence of improved outcomes. During the last 5 yrs, both clinical and experimental studies demonstrated that the A and B of these ABCs, and specifically positive-pressure ventilation, may not be essential during the initial 6 to 12 mins of CPR under conditions of sudden dysrhythmic cardiac arrest and in the absence of asphyxia. Recent studies further suggested that either or both precordial compression and spontaneous gasping may of itself generate sufficient alveolar ventilation during the initial 6 mins of CPR. Defibrillation now emerges as the highest priority. Automated defibrillators have a pivotal role. The need for objective controlled research, including experience with devices in clinical settings and technical improvements of operation, are essential.

心肺复苏研究:重新排序优先级。
心肺复苏术的“abc”,即气道、呼吸和循环,代表了美国心脏协会目前建议和教授给基本生命支持(BLS)和高级生命支持(ALS)提供者的干预措施顺序。然而,在怀疑或确认心室颤动的情况下,abc可能会推迟,以便优先进行外部电反击。然而,根据目前的规定,通过胸部按压(或其他机械手段)来恢复血液循环仍然是BLS和ALS三个优先事项中最低的。这种优先次序的排序在很大程度上是基于共识,而不是基于改善结果的客观实验或临床证据。在过去的5年中,临床和实验研究都表明,在突发心律失常的心脏骤停和没有窒息的情况下,这些abc的A和B,特别是正压通气,在CPR开始的6到12分钟可能不是必需的。最近的研究进一步表明,在心肺复苏术开始的6分钟内,心前压迫和自发呼吸可以自行产生足够的肺泡通气。除颤现在成为当务之急。自动除颤器起着关键作用。客观对照研究的需要,包括在临床环境中使用器械的经验和操作的技术改进,是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信