A rapid culture assay for examining measles virus infections from urine specimens

Toni Whistler, Nigel Blackburn
{"title":"A rapid culture assay for examining measles virus infections from urine specimens","authors":"Toni Whistler,&nbsp;Nigel Blackburn","doi":"10.1016/S0928-0197(97)00270-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Background:</strong> Large numbers of measles virus (MV) specimens are processed in our laboratory each year as part of a molecular epidemiological study of MV in South Africa. The development of a sensitive, rapid virus isolation system is needed to cope with the number of specimens processed.</p><p><strong>Objectives:</strong> A comparison was made of centrifugation-enhanced shell vial culture and standard tissue culture using B95a cells for the isolation of MV from throat swabs and urine.</p><p><strong>Study design:</strong> The rapid method was initially evaluated using Schwarz vaccine virus and then compared to standard culture using throat swab specimens.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> The shell vial assay proved to be ten times more sensitive than standard culture in the initial evaluation. Of 43 throat swab specimens, 37 (86%) were positive and 6 (14%) negative in standard culture using B95a cells. The specimens were removed after adsorption in standard culture, frozen and then used in the shell vial assay. It was found that <span><math><mtext>16</mtext><mtext>27</mtext></math></span> were positive in the shell vial assay (24 of these 27 being positive in standard culture,) and 8 negative and 8 specimens gave an indeterminate result. For the 45 urine specimens used in the shell vial assay, 71% were positive, 11% negative and 18% gave an indeterminate result, due to too few cells being present for antigen determination by indirect fluorescent antibody assay. Results were obtained in 4 days, as opposed to the average of 14 days for confirmed isolation in standard culture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Rapid culture substantially reduced total test time, was less labour-intensive and was as sensitive as standard culture for the isolation of measles virus from clinical specimens.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79479,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and diagnostic virology","volume":"7 3","pages":"Pages 193-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0928-0197(97)00270-5","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and diagnostic virology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928019797002705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: Large numbers of measles virus (MV) specimens are processed in our laboratory each year as part of a molecular epidemiological study of MV in South Africa. The development of a sensitive, rapid virus isolation system is needed to cope with the number of specimens processed.

Objectives: A comparison was made of centrifugation-enhanced shell vial culture and standard tissue culture using B95a cells for the isolation of MV from throat swabs and urine.

Study design: The rapid method was initially evaluated using Schwarz vaccine virus and then compared to standard culture using throat swab specimens.

Results: The shell vial assay proved to be ten times more sensitive than standard culture in the initial evaluation. Of 43 throat swab specimens, 37 (86%) were positive and 6 (14%) negative in standard culture using B95a cells. The specimens were removed after adsorption in standard culture, frozen and then used in the shell vial assay. It was found that 1627 were positive in the shell vial assay (24 of these 27 being positive in standard culture,) and 8 negative and 8 specimens gave an indeterminate result. For the 45 urine specimens used in the shell vial assay, 71% were positive, 11% negative and 18% gave an indeterminate result, due to too few cells being present for antigen determination by indirect fluorescent antibody assay. Results were obtained in 4 days, as opposed to the average of 14 days for confirmed isolation in standard culture.

Conclusion: Rapid culture substantially reduced total test time, was less labour-intensive and was as sensitive as standard culture for the isolation of measles virus from clinical specimens.

从尿液标本中检测麻疹病毒感染的快速培养试验
背景:作为南非麻疹病毒分子流行病学研究的一部分,每年在我们的实验室处理大量麻疹病毒(MV)标本。需要开发一种灵敏、快速的病毒分离系统,以应付处理的标本数量。目的:比较B95a细胞离心强化壳瓶培养和标准组织培养对咽拭子和尿液中MV的分离效果。研究设计:首先用施瓦茨疫苗病毒对快速培养方法进行评估,然后用咽拭子标本与标准培养方法进行比较。结果:在初步评价中,壳瓶法比标准培养法的灵敏度高10倍。43份咽拭子标本中,37份(86%)在B95a细胞标准培养中呈阳性,6份(14%)呈阴性。样品在标准培养中吸附后取出,冷冻后用于壳瓶试验。结果发现,1627例壳瓶法阳性(其中24例标准培养阳性),8例阴性,8例结果不确定。在45份用于壳瓶试验的尿液样本中,71%为阳性,11%为阴性,18%的结果不确定,这是由于间接荧光抗体试验中存在的细胞太少,无法进行抗原测定。结果在4天内获得,而在标准培养中确认分离平均需要14天。结论:快速培养在临床标本中分离麻疹病毒时,大大缩短了总检测时间,减少了劳动强度,灵敏度与标准培养相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信