Understanding discourses of the worried well.

G Eade, J Bradshaw
{"title":"Understanding discourses of the worried well.","authors":"G Eade,&nbsp;J Bradshaw","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper undertakes a deconstruction of the discourses of the 'worried well' population, a population argued to be particularly affected by the biomedical discourse. This deconstruction highlights the 'naturalized, glossed-over, unarticulated presuppositions' supported by hegemonic discourses of medicine. The historical development of the biomedical framework, the assumptions underpinning scientific discourse, and in particular its treatment of women, are examined. Issues pertaining to the diagnosis and treatment of this population are also discussed. The paper concludes with the recognition that the impetus rests with nurses to be agents of change in the reconstruction of discourses surrounding the worried well, to view clients labelled within biomedical discourse as worried well in a new light. Clients' subjective experiences of health must be valued, recognized and contextualized, thereby converting the rhetoric of holistic care into reality.</p>","PeriodicalId":79537,"journal":{"name":"The Australian and New Zealand journal of mental health nursing","volume":"4 2","pages":"61-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian and New Zealand journal of mental health nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper undertakes a deconstruction of the discourses of the 'worried well' population, a population argued to be particularly affected by the biomedical discourse. This deconstruction highlights the 'naturalized, glossed-over, unarticulated presuppositions' supported by hegemonic discourses of medicine. The historical development of the biomedical framework, the assumptions underpinning scientific discourse, and in particular its treatment of women, are examined. Issues pertaining to the diagnosis and treatment of this population are also discussed. The paper concludes with the recognition that the impetus rests with nurses to be agents of change in the reconstruction of discourses surrounding the worried well, to view clients labelled within biomedical discourse as worried well in a new light. Clients' subjective experiences of health must be valued, recognized and contextualized, thereby converting the rhetoric of holistic care into reality.

善于理解忧虑者的话语。
本文对“担心健康”人群的话语进行了解构,这一人群被认为特别受生物医学话语的影响。这种解构强调了医学霸权话语所支持的“自然化的、粉饰的、未阐明的预设”。研究了生物医学框架的历史发展、支撑科学论述的假设,特别是对妇女的待遇。有关诊断和治疗的问题,这一人群也进行了讨论。论文的结论是认识到,护士的动力在于成为围绕担忧的话语重建的变革推动者,以新的视角看待生物医学话语中被标记为担忧的客户。客户对健康的主观体验必须得到重视、认可和情境化,从而将整体护理的修辞转化为现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信