Correlation of functional magnetic source imaging with intraoperative cortical stimulation in neurosurgical patients

T.P.L. Roberts, E. Zusman, M. McDermott, N. Barbaro, H.A. Rowley
{"title":"Correlation of functional magnetic source imaging with intraoperative cortical stimulation in neurosurgical patients","authors":"T.P.L. Roberts,&nbsp;E. Zusman,&nbsp;M. McDermott,&nbsp;N. Barbaro,&nbsp;H.A. Rowley","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1522-712X(1995)1:6<339::AID-IGS5>3.0.CO;2-B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study compared noninvasive preoperative functional imaging by using magneto-encephalography (MEG) with intraoperative direct cortical stimulation in ten patients undergoing neurosurgery. The goal was to assess the accuracy and reliability of MEG-based functional imaging in these patients as a possible replacement or adjunct for direct cortical stimulation with electrocorticography.</p><p>Objective comparison of intraoperative mapping with preoperative MEG procedures was achieved by intraoperative recording of mapped cortical locations for motor responses using an interactive image-guided surgical device, the ISG viewing wand, with which mapping points could be marked on a previously acquired (MRI) set. In all ten patients, at least one stimulation site elicited a response during both MEG and intraoperative mapping. The central sulcus ipsilateral to the lesion was only directly visible on high-resolution MRIs in 3/10 cases and equivocally in 2/10. Coregistered with MRI to form magnetic source images (MSIs), MEG predictions of the postcentral gyrus were possible in all 10 cases. In all 10 cases, these were in agreement with intraoperative estimation of the precentral gyrus.</p><p>Functional mapping of somatosensory cortex was achieved noninvasively in surgical patients by using MSI. The accuracy, compared with cortical stimulation, was always sufficient to define motor and somatosensory strips. <i>J Image Guid Surg 1:339–347 (1995)</i>. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</p>","PeriodicalId":79505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of image guided surgery","volume":"1 6","pages":"339-347"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"58","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of image guided surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291522-712X%281995%291%3A6%3C339%3A%3AAID-IGS5%3E3.0.CO%3B2-B","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58

Abstract

This study compared noninvasive preoperative functional imaging by using magneto-encephalography (MEG) with intraoperative direct cortical stimulation in ten patients undergoing neurosurgery. The goal was to assess the accuracy and reliability of MEG-based functional imaging in these patients as a possible replacement or adjunct for direct cortical stimulation with electrocorticography.

Objective comparison of intraoperative mapping with preoperative MEG procedures was achieved by intraoperative recording of mapped cortical locations for motor responses using an interactive image-guided surgical device, the ISG viewing wand, with which mapping points could be marked on a previously acquired (MRI) set. In all ten patients, at least one stimulation site elicited a response during both MEG and intraoperative mapping. The central sulcus ipsilateral to the lesion was only directly visible on high-resolution MRIs in 3/10 cases and equivocally in 2/10. Coregistered with MRI to form magnetic source images (MSIs), MEG predictions of the postcentral gyrus were possible in all 10 cases. In all 10 cases, these were in agreement with intraoperative estimation of the precentral gyrus.

Functional mapping of somatosensory cortex was achieved noninvasively in surgical patients by using MSI. The accuracy, compared with cortical stimulation, was always sufficient to define motor and somatosensory strips. J Image Guid Surg 1:339–347 (1995). © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

神经外科患者术中皮质刺激与功能磁源成像的相关性
本研究对10例接受神经外科手术的患者进行了无创术前脑磁图(MEG)和术中直接皮质刺激的功能成像比较。目的是评估这些患者基于脑电成像的功能成像的准确性和可靠性,作为皮质电成像直接刺激的可能替代或辅助手段。术中使用交互式图像引导手术设备ISG观察棒记录运动反应的皮质位置映射,可以在先前获得的(MRI)集上标记映射点,从而实现术中绘图与术前MEG程序的客观比较。在所有10例患者中,至少有一个刺激部位在MEG和术中测绘期间引起了反应。在高分辨率mri上,病灶同侧的中央沟仅在3/10的病例中直接可见,在2/10的病例中模糊可见。与MRI共同注册形成磁源图像(msi),在所有10例病例中,MEG预测中枢后回是可能的。在所有10例中,这些与术中对中央前回的估计一致。用MSI对外科病人进行无创的体感觉皮质功能定位。与皮质刺激相比,其准确性总是足以定义运动和体感条带。[J] .中华影像杂志,1999,1(3):339 - 347。©1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信