The identification of thresholds of acceptability and danger: the biological route.

J V Tarazona
{"title":"The identification of thresholds of acceptability and danger: the biological route.","authors":"J V Tarazona","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-60682-3_12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The application of scientific concepts to management decisions is a clear need nowadays. The regulation of environmental pollutants requires the application of cost/benefit analysis. Human health and ecosystem status can be seriously affected and, therefore, are essential parts of the cost assessment. Ecotoxicology must provide the scientific basis for the prediction, control, monitoring and diagnosis of the expected/observed effects of chemical substances on the structure and function of ecosystems. The basic problem is to select which levels of risk/alteration can be accepted, taken into account the degree of uncertainty in the assessment. This paper summarizes some biologically based approaches that try to reduce the level of uncertainty and/or to improve the decisions on the basic thresholds: acceptable/unacceptable and safe/dangerous. The presentation will focus on two specific aspects. Starting with prediction related topics, the first aspect will regard on the evolution of Hazard and Risk Assessments and the biological developments that try to improve these evaluations. The discussion will cover ecotoxicological concepts included in the adopted criteria for different regulatory aspects, i.e. setting Water Quality Objectives, classifying potential hazards using the \"inherent\" toxicity of a substance, or predicting Non Effect Concentration in risk characterization procedures. The second aspect will cover the use of biologically based systems as complementary and even alternative tools in management decisions related to the control, monitoring and diagnosis of the environmental alterations produced by highly toxic chemicals on biological systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":8353,"journal":{"name":"Archives of toxicology. Supplement. = Archiv fur Toxikologie. Supplement","volume":"19 ","pages":"137-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of toxicology. Supplement. = Archiv fur Toxikologie. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60682-3_12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The application of scientific concepts to management decisions is a clear need nowadays. The regulation of environmental pollutants requires the application of cost/benefit analysis. Human health and ecosystem status can be seriously affected and, therefore, are essential parts of the cost assessment. Ecotoxicology must provide the scientific basis for the prediction, control, monitoring and diagnosis of the expected/observed effects of chemical substances on the structure and function of ecosystems. The basic problem is to select which levels of risk/alteration can be accepted, taken into account the degree of uncertainty in the assessment. This paper summarizes some biologically based approaches that try to reduce the level of uncertainty and/or to improve the decisions on the basic thresholds: acceptable/unacceptable and safe/dangerous. The presentation will focus on two specific aspects. Starting with prediction related topics, the first aspect will regard on the evolution of Hazard and Risk Assessments and the biological developments that try to improve these evaluations. The discussion will cover ecotoxicological concepts included in the adopted criteria for different regulatory aspects, i.e. setting Water Quality Objectives, classifying potential hazards using the "inherent" toxicity of a substance, or predicting Non Effect Concentration in risk characterization procedures. The second aspect will cover the use of biologically based systems as complementary and even alternative tools in management decisions related to the control, monitoring and diagnosis of the environmental alterations produced by highly toxic chemicals on biological systems.

可接受性和危险阈值的识别:生物途径。
将科学概念应用于管理决策是当今的明确需要。管制环境污染物需要运用成本/效益分析。人类健康和生态系统状况可能受到严重影响,因此是成本评估的重要组成部分。生态毒理学必须为化学物质对生态系统结构和功能的预期/观测效应的预测、控制、监测和诊断提供科学依据。基本问题是考虑到评估中的不确定程度,选择哪些级别的风险/变更可以被接受。本文总结了一些基于生物学的方法,这些方法试图降低不确定性水平和/或改进对基本阈值的决策:可接受/不可接受和安全/危险。这次演讲将着重于两个方面。从预测相关主题开始,第一个方面将关注危害和风险评估的演变以及试图改进这些评估的生物学发展。讨论将涵盖不同监管方面采用的标准中包含的生态毒理学概念,即设定水质目标,使用物质的“固有”毒性对潜在危害进行分类,或预测风险表征程序中的非效应浓度。第二个方面将包括在有关控制、监测和诊断由剧毒化学品对生物系统造成的环境变化的管理决策中,利用基于生物的系统作为补充甚至替代工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信