[Monitoring of multiple trauma in an emergency hospital unit].

Cahiers d'anesthesiologie Pub Date : 1996-01-01
A Landais, T Aviles, C Cuvier, K McGee, K N'Guyen
{"title":"[Monitoring of multiple trauma in an emergency hospital unit].","authors":"A Landais,&nbsp;T Aviles,&nbsp;C Cuvier,&nbsp;K McGee,&nbsp;K N'Guyen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the monitoring of multiple trauma patients in the emergency hospital setting the use of monitors should be graduated. However, the use and interpretation of data from these monitors is becoming increasingly complex and can lead to errors and responses which may not be adopted. Clinical nomination and observation have their limits and the anaesthetist is faced with the added difficulties of interpretation of data from monitors and is pitfalls. The management of the patient is based on this human-machine relationship, which provides the basis for the therapeutic attitude and the treatment which ensues. Basic monitoring comprises a pulse oximeter, a capnograph, an ECG and a blood pressure monitor, 52% of incidents are detected by these instruments; 27% by SpO2, 24% by capnography. The pertinence is 82% for the oximeter when used alone and 55% for the capnography alone, although when the two are used together this increases to 88%. If the blood pressure monitor is added the pertinence increases to 93%, and to 95% if the FiO2 is monitored. The use of monitors of levels of haemoglobin or haematocrit must take into account the important variations in volaemia. The displayed values have a poor predictive value. The second level of monitoring comprises the use of a pulmonary artery catheter. The errors in measurement and interpretation are reviewed and finally, we consider the possible use of FOE transoesophageal echocardiography in the multiple trauma patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":77055,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers d'anesthesiologie","volume":"44 4","pages":"347-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cahiers d'anesthesiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the monitoring of multiple trauma patients in the emergency hospital setting the use of monitors should be graduated. However, the use and interpretation of data from these monitors is becoming increasingly complex and can lead to errors and responses which may not be adopted. Clinical nomination and observation have their limits and the anaesthetist is faced with the added difficulties of interpretation of data from monitors and is pitfalls. The management of the patient is based on this human-machine relationship, which provides the basis for the therapeutic attitude and the treatment which ensues. Basic monitoring comprises a pulse oximeter, a capnograph, an ECG and a blood pressure monitor, 52% of incidents are detected by these instruments; 27% by SpO2, 24% by capnography. The pertinence is 82% for the oximeter when used alone and 55% for the capnography alone, although when the two are used together this increases to 88%. If the blood pressure monitor is added the pertinence increases to 93%, and to 95% if the FiO2 is monitored. The use of monitors of levels of haemoglobin or haematocrit must take into account the important variations in volaemia. The displayed values have a poor predictive value. The second level of monitoring comprises the use of a pulmonary artery catheter. The errors in measurement and interpretation are reviewed and finally, we consider the possible use of FOE transoesophageal echocardiography in the multiple trauma patient.

[医院急诊病房多重创伤的监测]。
在急诊医院对多发创伤患者的监护中,监护仪的使用应分级。然而,使用和解释来自这些监测仪的数据正变得越来越复杂,并可能导致错误和可能不被采用的反应。临床提名和观察有其局限性,麻醉师面临着解释监测数据的额外困难和陷阱。病人的管理就是基于这种人机关系,这为治疗态度和随后的治疗提供了依据。基本监测包括脉搏血氧仪、血压计、心电图和血压监测仪,52%的事故是由这些仪器检测到的;27%是SpO2, 24%是血管造影。血氧仪单独使用时的准确率为82%,单独使用血氧仪时的准确率为55%,两者结合使用时的准确率增加到88%。如果添加血压监测器,则相关性增加到93%,如果监测FiO2,则相关性增加到95%。使用血红蛋白或红细胞压积水平监测仪时,必须考虑到血容量的重要变化。显示的值具有较差的预测值。第二级监测包括使用肺动脉导管。我们回顾了测量和解释中的误差,最后,我们考虑了FOE经食管超声心动图在多发性创伤患者中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信