Cognitive development and behaviour in very low birthweight twins at four years.

J A Dezoete, B A MacArthur
{"title":"Cognitive development and behaviour in very low birthweight twins at four years.","authors":"J A Dezoete,&nbsp;B A MacArthur","doi":"10.1017/s0001566000000921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study included two groups of 37 children, one of twins and the other singletons at 4 years of age. All subjects has birthweights under 1500 grams and individuals in the groups were matched for birth date, gender and birthweight. Except when parental socio-economic status was taken into account, no significant differences between twins and singletons were observed on any of the results of The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, nor were there any when the twins and singletons were divided into groups with birthweights < 1000 grams and 1000 to 1499 grams. When cognitive scores were analysed in relation to socio-economic status, there were significant differences in the whole population between subjects in the high and low socioeconomic status groups, with higher mean scores for the former. Comparison of the twins and singletons with parents in the lower socio-economic status group did not produce any significant differences but in the case of the upper socio-economic status group the singletons scored significantly better than the twins in Quantitative Reasoning and on the Composite Score. No significant differences were demonstrated in the clinical assessment of speech, language or behaviour. So far as general life considerations and health were concerned only one significant difference was found and this was for the number of siblings born subsequently, with more born in the singleton families. This study did not provide support for the view that singletons and twins differ significantly in the areas considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":7118,"journal":{"name":"Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae","volume":"45 3","pages":"325-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/s0001566000000921","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0001566000000921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This study included two groups of 37 children, one of twins and the other singletons at 4 years of age. All subjects has birthweights under 1500 grams and individuals in the groups were matched for birth date, gender and birthweight. Except when parental socio-economic status was taken into account, no significant differences between twins and singletons were observed on any of the results of The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, nor were there any when the twins and singletons were divided into groups with birthweights < 1000 grams and 1000 to 1499 grams. When cognitive scores were analysed in relation to socio-economic status, there were significant differences in the whole population between subjects in the high and low socioeconomic status groups, with higher mean scores for the former. Comparison of the twins and singletons with parents in the lower socio-economic status group did not produce any significant differences but in the case of the upper socio-economic status group the singletons scored significantly better than the twins in Quantitative Reasoning and on the Composite Score. No significant differences were demonstrated in the clinical assessment of speech, language or behaviour. So far as general life considerations and health were concerned only one significant difference was found and this was for the number of siblings born subsequently, with more born in the singleton families. This study did not provide support for the view that singletons and twins differ significantly in the areas considered.

四岁时极低出生体重双胞胎的认知发展和行为。
这项研究包括两组37名儿童,一组是双胞胎,另一组是4岁的单胎儿童。所有受试者的出生体重都在1500克以下,各组个体的出生日期、性别和出生体重都进行了匹配。除了将父母的社会经济地位考虑在内外,在斯坦福-比奈智力量表的任何结果中,双胞胎和单胎之间都没有发现明显的差异,当双胞胎和单胎被分为出生体重小于1000克和1000至1499克的两组时,也没有发现任何差异。当分析认知得分与社会经济地位的关系时,在整个人群中,高社会经济地位组和低社会经济地位组的受试者之间存在显著差异,前者的平均得分更高。社会经济地位较低的双胞胎和独生子女的比较没有产生任何显著差异,但在社会经济地位较高的群体中,独生子女在定量推理和综合得分方面的得分明显高于双胞胎。在言语、语言或行为的临床评估中没有显着差异。就一般生活和健康方面的考虑而言,只发现了一个显著的差异,那就是随后出生的兄弟姐妹的数量,独生子女家庭出生的兄弟姐妹更多。这项研究并没有支持单胎和双胞胎在所考虑的领域有显著差异的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信