Evaluation of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) application in diagnosis of bovine leukaemia virus (BLV) infection in naturally infected cattle.

H Fechner, A Kurg, L Geue, P Blankenstein, G Mewes, D Ebner, D Beier
{"title":"Evaluation of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) application in diagnosis of bovine leukaemia virus (BLV) infection in naturally infected cattle.","authors":"H Fechner,&nbsp;A Kurg,&nbsp;L Geue,&nbsp;P Blankenstein,&nbsp;G Mewes,&nbsp;D Ebner,&nbsp;D Beier","doi":"10.1111/j.1439-0450.1996.tb00361.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The practical application of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the diagnosis of bovine leukaemia virus (BLV) infections in naturally infected cattle was evaluated. Compared to serological tests the PCR was definitely found to be a more sensitive method, yielding the highest number of positive results (10% more compared to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, (ELISA), and 17.7% more compared to agar-gel immunodiffusion, (AGID)). In testing cattle from herds with BLV incidence under 5%, out of 52 provirus positive cattle only 43 were correctly identified by ELISA. When compared to AGID only 37 of the 52 PCR positive animals were correctly identified. Of 18 cattle imported from the Slovak Republic and kept in a quarantine stable, four were found to be BLV provirus positive by PCR, while serological tests indicated one animal positive and three negative. Therefore, it is impossible to prevent the spread of the infection from one country to another by serological testing only. Moreover, it is feasible to identify animals with changing antibody titres correctly by PCR. Using PCR we were also able to distinguish BLV infected from uninfected calves that were serologically positive due to colostral antibodies. Higher sensitivity of BLV provirus detection by PCR was achieved using env gene rather than tax gene specific primers. Negative results by PCR in cases of positive serological reactions are still possible, as shown in case of one adult animal. These findings indicate that PCR is a highly sensitive method and might be successfully used and economically advantageous for different practical applications in detection of BLV infection in naturally infected cattle.</p>","PeriodicalId":23829,"journal":{"name":"Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin. Reihe B. Journal of veterinary medicine. Series B","volume":"43 10","pages":"621-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1439-0450.1996.tb00361.x","citationCount":"65","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin. Reihe B. Journal of veterinary medicine. Series B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0450.1996.tb00361.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 65

Abstract

The practical application of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the diagnosis of bovine leukaemia virus (BLV) infections in naturally infected cattle was evaluated. Compared to serological tests the PCR was definitely found to be a more sensitive method, yielding the highest number of positive results (10% more compared to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, (ELISA), and 17.7% more compared to agar-gel immunodiffusion, (AGID)). In testing cattle from herds with BLV incidence under 5%, out of 52 provirus positive cattle only 43 were correctly identified by ELISA. When compared to AGID only 37 of the 52 PCR positive animals were correctly identified. Of 18 cattle imported from the Slovak Republic and kept in a quarantine stable, four were found to be BLV provirus positive by PCR, while serological tests indicated one animal positive and three negative. Therefore, it is impossible to prevent the spread of the infection from one country to another by serological testing only. Moreover, it is feasible to identify animals with changing antibody titres correctly by PCR. Using PCR we were also able to distinguish BLV infected from uninfected calves that were serologically positive due to colostral antibodies. Higher sensitivity of BLV provirus detection by PCR was achieved using env gene rather than tax gene specific primers. Negative results by PCR in cases of positive serological reactions are still possible, as shown in case of one adult animal. These findings indicate that PCR is a highly sensitive method and might be successfully used and economically advantageous for different practical applications in detection of BLV infection in naturally infected cattle.

聚合酶链反应(PCR)在牛白血病病毒(BLV)自然感染诊断中的应用评价。
评价了聚合酶链反应(PCR)在自然感染牛中诊断牛白血病病毒(BLV)感染的实际应用。与血清学试验相比,PCR无疑是一种更敏感的方法,阳性结果最多(与酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)相比多10%,与琼脂凝胶免疫扩散试验(AGID)相比多17.7%)。在检测来自BLV发病率低于5%的牛群的牛时,52头原病毒阳性牛中只有43头被ELISA正确识别。与AGID相比,52只PCR阳性动物中只有37只被正确识别。在从斯洛伐克共和国进口并饲养在检疫马厩的18头牛中,通过聚合酶链反应发现4头牛BLV病毒阳性,而血清学检测显示1头牛阳性,3头牛阴性。因此,仅通过血清学检测是不可能防止感染从一个国家传播到另一个国家的。此外,用PCR方法通过改变抗体滴度来正确鉴定动物是可行的。利用PCR,我们还能够区分BLV感染的小牛与未感染的小牛,后者由于初侧抗体而血清学阳性。用env基因的PCR检测BLV病毒比用tax基因特异性引物检测BLV病毒的灵敏度更高。在血清学反应阳性的情况下,仍有可能出现PCR阴性结果,如一只成年动物的情况所示。这些结果表明,PCR是一种高度敏感的方法,可以成功地用于检测自然感染牛BLV感染的各种实际应用,并且具有经济上的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信