H Fechner, A Kurg, L Geue, P Blankenstein, G Mewes, D Ebner, D Beier
{"title":"Evaluation of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) application in diagnosis of bovine leukaemia virus (BLV) infection in naturally infected cattle.","authors":"H Fechner, A Kurg, L Geue, P Blankenstein, G Mewes, D Ebner, D Beier","doi":"10.1111/j.1439-0450.1996.tb00361.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The practical application of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the diagnosis of bovine leukaemia virus (BLV) infections in naturally infected cattle was evaluated. Compared to serological tests the PCR was definitely found to be a more sensitive method, yielding the highest number of positive results (10% more compared to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, (ELISA), and 17.7% more compared to agar-gel immunodiffusion, (AGID)). In testing cattle from herds with BLV incidence under 5%, out of 52 provirus positive cattle only 43 were correctly identified by ELISA. When compared to AGID only 37 of the 52 PCR positive animals were correctly identified. Of 18 cattle imported from the Slovak Republic and kept in a quarantine stable, four were found to be BLV provirus positive by PCR, while serological tests indicated one animal positive and three negative. Therefore, it is impossible to prevent the spread of the infection from one country to another by serological testing only. Moreover, it is feasible to identify animals with changing antibody titres correctly by PCR. Using PCR we were also able to distinguish BLV infected from uninfected calves that were serologically positive due to colostral antibodies. Higher sensitivity of BLV provirus detection by PCR was achieved using env gene rather than tax gene specific primers. Negative results by PCR in cases of positive serological reactions are still possible, as shown in case of one adult animal. These findings indicate that PCR is a highly sensitive method and might be successfully used and economically advantageous for different practical applications in detection of BLV infection in naturally infected cattle.</p>","PeriodicalId":23829,"journal":{"name":"Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin. Reihe B. Journal of veterinary medicine. Series B","volume":"43 10","pages":"621-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1439-0450.1996.tb00361.x","citationCount":"65","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin. Reihe B. Journal of veterinary medicine. Series B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0450.1996.tb00361.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 65
Abstract
The practical application of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the diagnosis of bovine leukaemia virus (BLV) infections in naturally infected cattle was evaluated. Compared to serological tests the PCR was definitely found to be a more sensitive method, yielding the highest number of positive results (10% more compared to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, (ELISA), and 17.7% more compared to agar-gel immunodiffusion, (AGID)). In testing cattle from herds with BLV incidence under 5%, out of 52 provirus positive cattle only 43 were correctly identified by ELISA. When compared to AGID only 37 of the 52 PCR positive animals were correctly identified. Of 18 cattle imported from the Slovak Republic and kept in a quarantine stable, four were found to be BLV provirus positive by PCR, while serological tests indicated one animal positive and three negative. Therefore, it is impossible to prevent the spread of the infection from one country to another by serological testing only. Moreover, it is feasible to identify animals with changing antibody titres correctly by PCR. Using PCR we were also able to distinguish BLV infected from uninfected calves that were serologically positive due to colostral antibodies. Higher sensitivity of BLV provirus detection by PCR was achieved using env gene rather than tax gene specific primers. Negative results by PCR in cases of positive serological reactions are still possible, as shown in case of one adult animal. These findings indicate that PCR is a highly sensitive method and might be successfully used and economically advantageous for different practical applications in detection of BLV infection in naturally infected cattle.