rhGH use in children with CRI and undergoing dialysis post-transplant in Japan: a multicentre study. MultiCenter Study Group Japan.

H Kawaguchi, K Ito
{"title":"rhGH use in children with CRI and undergoing dialysis post-transplant in Japan: a multicentre study. MultiCenter Study Group Japan.","authors":"H Kawaguchi,&nbsp;K Ito","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We evaluated the effect of rhGH at both 0.5 and 1.0 i.u./kg/week, on the growth of 83 CRI (pre- and dialysis) and 23 transplanted children after one year. Growth velocity (GV) was significantly increased in predialysis children on a dose of 0.5 i.u. (p < 0.001), from 3.8cm/year at baseline to 7.8cm/year at six months and 7.3cm/year at one year. On a dose of 1.0 i.u., GV was increased from 4.5cm/year at baseline to 10.3cm/year at six months and 8.7cm/year at one year (p < 0.01). When the increment in GV was compared a significant difference was noted between 0.5 i.u. and 0.1 i.u. at both six and 12 months (p < 0.01). GV was also significantly increased in dialysed children treated with 0.5 i.u., from 3.5cm/year to 5.6cm/year at six months (p < 0.01) and 5.4cm/year at one year (p < 0.01). On a dose of 1.0 i.u., the increase was from 3.4 to 8.4cm/year at six months (p < 0.001) and 8.3cm/year at one year (p < 0.01). There was a significant difference in GV between the 0.5 and 1.0 i.u. groups at both six and 12 months (p < 0.01). In transplanted children, GV was significantly improved over one year of GH treatment from 5.0 to 7.7cm/year at 0.5 i.u. (p < 0.05) and from 3.7 to 6.3cm/year at 1.0 i.u. (p < 0.05); however, there was no statistical difference between the groups. Seven out of 23 children showed evidence of deterioration of graft function during rhGH treatment. This was due to acute rejection (AR) in every case. AR was noted in two of 10 children (20%) in the 0.5 i.u. group and five of 13 children (38%) in the 1.0 i.u. group. Our results demonstrate that rhGH effectively stimulates GV, not only in CRI, but also in dialysed children. Attention should, however, be paid to deterioration of renal function.</p>","PeriodicalId":77500,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical practice. Supplement","volume":"85 ","pages":"26-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical practice. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We evaluated the effect of rhGH at both 0.5 and 1.0 i.u./kg/week, on the growth of 83 CRI (pre- and dialysis) and 23 transplanted children after one year. Growth velocity (GV) was significantly increased in predialysis children on a dose of 0.5 i.u. (p < 0.001), from 3.8cm/year at baseline to 7.8cm/year at six months and 7.3cm/year at one year. On a dose of 1.0 i.u., GV was increased from 4.5cm/year at baseline to 10.3cm/year at six months and 8.7cm/year at one year (p < 0.01). When the increment in GV was compared a significant difference was noted between 0.5 i.u. and 0.1 i.u. at both six and 12 months (p < 0.01). GV was also significantly increased in dialysed children treated with 0.5 i.u., from 3.5cm/year to 5.6cm/year at six months (p < 0.01) and 5.4cm/year at one year (p < 0.01). On a dose of 1.0 i.u., the increase was from 3.4 to 8.4cm/year at six months (p < 0.001) and 8.3cm/year at one year (p < 0.01). There was a significant difference in GV between the 0.5 and 1.0 i.u. groups at both six and 12 months (p < 0.01). In transplanted children, GV was significantly improved over one year of GH treatment from 5.0 to 7.7cm/year at 0.5 i.u. (p < 0.05) and from 3.7 to 6.3cm/year at 1.0 i.u. (p < 0.05); however, there was no statistical difference between the groups. Seven out of 23 children showed evidence of deterioration of graft function during rhGH treatment. This was due to acute rejection (AR) in every case. AR was noted in two of 10 children (20%) in the 0.5 i.u. group and five of 13 children (38%) in the 1.0 i.u. group. Our results demonstrate that rhGH effectively stimulates GV, not only in CRI, but also in dialysed children. Attention should, however, be paid to deterioration of renal function.

日本CRI和移植后透析患儿中rhGH的使用:一项多中心研究。日本多中心研究组。
我们评估了0.5和1.0 iu /kg/周rhGH对83例CRI(透析前)和23例移植儿童一年后生长的影响。透析前儿童的生长速度(GV)在0.5 iu的剂量下显著增加(p < 0.001),从基线时的3.8cm/年增加到6个月时的7.8cm/年和1年后的7.3cm/年。在1.0 iu的剂量下,GV从基线时的4.5cm/年增加到6个月时的10.3cm/年和1年后的8.7cm/年(p < 0.01)。当比较GV的增量时,在6个月和12个月时,0.5 iu和0.1 iu之间存在显著差异(p < 0.01)。透析患儿GV也显著增加,6个月时由3.5cm/年增至5.6cm/年(p < 0.01), 1年时增至5.4cm/年(p < 0.01)。剂量为1.0 iu时,6个月时从3.4 cm/年增加到8.4cm/年(p < 0.001), 1年时增加到8.3cm/年(p < 0.01)。0.5和1.0 iu组在6个月和12个月的GV差异有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。在移植儿童中,生长激素治疗一年后,GV显著改善,0.5 iu时从5.0到7.7cm/年(p < 0.05), 1.0 iu时从3.7到6.3cm/年(p < 0.05);然而,两组之间没有统计学差异。23名儿童中有7名在rhGH治疗期间表现出移植物功能恶化的迹象。这是由于急性排斥反应(AR)。0.5 iu组10名儿童中有2名(20%)出现AR, 1.0 iu组13名儿童中有5名(38%)出现AR。我们的研究结果表明,rhGH不仅在CRI中有效地刺激GV,而且在透析儿童中也有效。但应注意肾功能的恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书