Physician productivity measurement, methodology and implementation.

P Lagasse
{"title":"Physician productivity measurement, methodology and implementation.","authors":"P Lagasse","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>These components are integrated into a single monthly report and distributed to all departments in the health system. Figures 2 and 3 illustrate the four main reports the system can generate. Shown are the overall facility report and the six month trend; the departmental report showing each department as compared to the facility; an individual department report that clearly illustrates each physician's contribution; and finally an individual provider report with trend analysis. These reports are modified slightly as required by each department, but the core information of RVUs/hour remains the basic comparative element. Each report contains comparisons of individual providers within their specialty, department or group, and at the facility and system level. Each department with specific needs has the report prepared to meet these needs, yet the entire facility follows a single standard to make inter-department comparisons meaningful. The information available on each individual report includes: Month. Number of patient visits. Number of unique patients. Average Number of visits per patient. Charges. Part A and Part B worked hours. Paid hours. RVUs generated per worked hour. Productivity measured against. The providers department average. The total group average. Year to date averages. Graphical depiction of RVUs. Hour with trend line. The department summary contains similar information while the department detail report provides a means to easily compare providers within the department against each other and the group as a whole. The overall BMERF report uses summary information from each department and provides a graphical indication of how each department is performing.</p>","PeriodicalId":77231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Health Systems","volume":"5 2","pages":"41-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

These components are integrated into a single monthly report and distributed to all departments in the health system. Figures 2 and 3 illustrate the four main reports the system can generate. Shown are the overall facility report and the six month trend; the departmental report showing each department as compared to the facility; an individual department report that clearly illustrates each physician's contribution; and finally an individual provider report with trend analysis. These reports are modified slightly as required by each department, but the core information of RVUs/hour remains the basic comparative element. Each report contains comparisons of individual providers within their specialty, department or group, and at the facility and system level. Each department with specific needs has the report prepared to meet these needs, yet the entire facility follows a single standard to make inter-department comparisons meaningful. The information available on each individual report includes: Month. Number of patient visits. Number of unique patients. Average Number of visits per patient. Charges. Part A and Part B worked hours. Paid hours. RVUs generated per worked hour. Productivity measured against. The providers department average. The total group average. Year to date averages. Graphical depiction of RVUs. Hour with trend line. The department summary contains similar information while the department detail report provides a means to easily compare providers within the department against each other and the group as a whole. The overall BMERF report uses summary information from each department and provides a graphical indication of how each department is performing.

医师生产力测量、方法与实施。
这些组成部分被整合到一份月度报告中,并分发给卫生系统的所有部门。图2和图3说明了系统可以生成的四个主要报告。显示的是整体设施报告和六个月趋势;显示各部门与设施比较的部门报告;每个科室的报告,清楚地说明每个医生的贡献;最后是单个供应商的趋势分析报告。这些报告根据各部门的要求略有修改,但rvu /h的核心信息仍然是基本的比较要素。每一份报告都包含了各自专业、部门或团体、设施和系统层面的个体提供者的比较。每个有特定需求的部门都准备了满足这些需求的报告,但整个设施遵循单一标准,使部门间的比较有意义。每个单独报告的可用信息包括:月。患者就诊次数。独特患者数量。每位患者的平均就诊次数。指控。甲乙双方的工作时间。支付时间。每工作小时产生的rvu。生产力衡量标准。供应商部门平均。总组平均值。年初至今的平均值。rvu的图形描述。有趋势线的小时。部门摘要包含类似的信息,而部门详细信息报告提供了一种方法,可以轻松地将部门内的提供者相互比较,并将整个组进行比较。总体BMERF报告使用来自每个部门的摘要信息,并提供每个部门如何执行的图形指示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信