Clinicopathological study of choroid plexus tumors: immunohistochemical features and evaluation of proliferative potential by PCNA and Ki-67 immunostaining.

T Kato, M Fujita, Y Sawamura, M Tada, H Abe, K Nagashima, N Nakamura
{"title":"Clinicopathological study of choroid plexus tumors: immunohistochemical features and evaluation of proliferative potential by PCNA and Ki-67 immunostaining.","authors":"T Kato,&nbsp;M Fujita,&nbsp;Y Sawamura,&nbsp;M Tada,&nbsp;H Abe,&nbsp;K Nagashima,&nbsp;N Nakamura","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This report concerns the retrospective immunohistochemical characterization and evaluation of the proliferative potential of eight choroid plexus tumors (CPTs) that included six cases of choroid plexus papilloma (CPP), one of whom had a recurrence, and two cases of choroid plexus carcinoma (CPC). Antibodies to prealbumin, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), vimentin, keratin, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were used to determine the immunohistochemical features of interest. The proliferative potential was evaluated with antibodies to proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and Ki-67. Antibody binding was visualized by the avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) method. Immunoreactivity was scored on a-to 4+ scale, and in the case of PCNA and Ki-67, expected as staining index (SI). All seven CPP specimens were immunostained for prealbumin, but not for CEA. Expression of GFAP, vimentin and keratin varied from one CPP case to another. Both CPCs expressed CEA, but not prealbumin, GFAP and keratin; one of them was vimentin-positive. As determined by immunostaining for Ki-67, the proliferative potential was lower in the CPPs than in the CPCs. Among the former, the highest Ki-67 SI was seen in the primary lesion of a recurring papilloma. On the other hand, immunostaining for PCNA gave less consistent SI values. Our results show that immunohistochemical assays for prealbumin and CEA expression are of significant value for the differential diagnosis of CPPs and CPCs, and that high Ki-67 SI values may serve as an indicator of CPP recurrence, even if the primary lesion is benign.</p>","PeriodicalId":79360,"journal":{"name":"Noshuyo byori = Brain tumor pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Noshuyo byori = Brain tumor pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This report concerns the retrospective immunohistochemical characterization and evaluation of the proliferative potential of eight choroid plexus tumors (CPTs) that included six cases of choroid plexus papilloma (CPP), one of whom had a recurrence, and two cases of choroid plexus carcinoma (CPC). Antibodies to prealbumin, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), vimentin, keratin, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were used to determine the immunohistochemical features of interest. The proliferative potential was evaluated with antibodies to proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and Ki-67. Antibody binding was visualized by the avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) method. Immunoreactivity was scored on a-to 4+ scale, and in the case of PCNA and Ki-67, expected as staining index (SI). All seven CPP specimens were immunostained for prealbumin, but not for CEA. Expression of GFAP, vimentin and keratin varied from one CPP case to another. Both CPCs expressed CEA, but not prealbumin, GFAP and keratin; one of them was vimentin-positive. As determined by immunostaining for Ki-67, the proliferative potential was lower in the CPPs than in the CPCs. Among the former, the highest Ki-67 SI was seen in the primary lesion of a recurring papilloma. On the other hand, immunostaining for PCNA gave less consistent SI values. Our results show that immunohistochemical assays for prealbumin and CEA expression are of significant value for the differential diagnosis of CPPs and CPCs, and that high Ki-67 SI values may serve as an indicator of CPP recurrence, even if the primary lesion is benign.

脉络膜丛肿瘤的临床病理研究:免疫组化特征及PCNA和Ki-67免疫染色对其增殖潜能的评价。
本文报道了8例脉络膜丛肿瘤(CPTs)的回顾性免疫组化特征和增殖潜力的评估,其中包括6例脉络膜丛乳头状瘤(CPP),其中1例复发,2例脉络膜丛癌(CPC)。使用白蛋白前抗体、胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)抗体、波形蛋白抗体、角蛋白抗体和癌胚抗原(CEA)抗体来确定感兴趣的免疫组织化学特征。用增殖细胞核抗原(PCNA)抗体和Ki-67抗体评价其增殖潜能。用亲和素-生物素-过氧化物酶复合物(ABC)法观察抗体结合。免疫反应性评分为a- 4+级,对于PCNA和Ki-67,预期为染色指数(SI)。所有7个CPP标本都进行了白蛋白前免疫染色,但没有CEA免疫染色。不同CPP病例间GFAP、vimentin和角蛋白的表达存在差异。两种CPCs均表达CEA,但不表达白蛋白前蛋白、GFAP和角蛋白;其中一人是文敏蛋白阳性。通过Ki-67免疫染色测定,cps的增殖潜能低于CPCs。在前者中,Ki-67 SI最高见于复发性乳头状瘤的原发病变。另一方面,PCNA免疫染色的SI值不太一致。我们的研究结果表明,免疫组化检测前白蛋白和CEA表达对CPPs和CPCs的鉴别诊断具有重要价值,并且高Ki-67 SI值可能作为CPP复发的指标,即使原发病变是良性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信