K Misumi, R V Matthews, G W Sun, G Mayeda, S Burstein, T L Shook
{"title":"Reduced distal embolization with transluminal extraction atherectomy compared to balloon angioplasty for saphenous vein graft disease.","authors":"K Misumi, R V Matthews, G W Sun, G Mayeda, S Burstein, T L Shook","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199611)39:3<246::AID-CCD8>3.0.CO;2-E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extraction atherectomy utilizes suction aspiration as an attempt to limit distal emboli during atherectomy. We sought to test the hypothesis that extraction atherectomy produces less distal embolization than balloon angioplasty when treating saphenous vein grafts. Among 163 consecutive, nonrandomized patients, 103 patients underwent transluminal extraction catheter (TEC) atherectomy with or without adjunctive balloon angioplasty, and 60 patients had conventional balloon angioplasty. Both groups showed comparably high procedural success rates (TEC 90.3%, angioplasty 83.3%, P = NS). TEC cases had a significantly lower incidence of angiographic distal embolization, compared with angioplasty (3.9% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.005). In cases with angiographic evidence of thrombus in the grafts, TEC maintained a significantly lower incidence of distal embolization than angioplasty (5.6% vs. 31.8%, P = 0.004). There were no statistical differences between the two groups regarding the incidence of other procedure-related complications, including death, myocardial infarction, or emergency coronary artery bypass grafting. TEC atherectomy appears to have a significantly lower incidence of distal embolization than balloon angioplasty when treating saphenous vein grafts, particularly in the presence of angiographically apparent thrombus.</p>","PeriodicalId":9664,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis","volume":"39 3","pages":"246-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199611)39:3<246::AID-CCD8>3.0.CO;2-E","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199611)39:3<246::AID-CCD8>3.0.CO;2-E","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20
Abstract
Extraction atherectomy utilizes suction aspiration as an attempt to limit distal emboli during atherectomy. We sought to test the hypothesis that extraction atherectomy produces less distal embolization than balloon angioplasty when treating saphenous vein grafts. Among 163 consecutive, nonrandomized patients, 103 patients underwent transluminal extraction catheter (TEC) atherectomy with or without adjunctive balloon angioplasty, and 60 patients had conventional balloon angioplasty. Both groups showed comparably high procedural success rates (TEC 90.3%, angioplasty 83.3%, P = NS). TEC cases had a significantly lower incidence of angiographic distal embolization, compared with angioplasty (3.9% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.005). In cases with angiographic evidence of thrombus in the grafts, TEC maintained a significantly lower incidence of distal embolization than angioplasty (5.6% vs. 31.8%, P = 0.004). There were no statistical differences between the two groups regarding the incidence of other procedure-related complications, including death, myocardial infarction, or emergency coronary artery bypass grafting. TEC atherectomy appears to have a significantly lower incidence of distal embolization than balloon angioplasty when treating saphenous vein grafts, particularly in the presence of angiographically apparent thrombus.
在动脉粥样硬化切除术中,抽吸作为限制远端栓塞的尝试。我们试图验证提取动脉粥样硬化切除术在治疗隐静脉移植物时比球囊血管成形术产生更少远端栓塞的假设。在163例连续的非随机患者中,103例患者行腔内拔管(TEC)动脉粥样硬化切除术,伴或不伴辅助球囊血管成形术,60例患者行常规球囊血管成形术。两组手术成功率均较高(TEC 90.3%,血管成形术83.3%,P = NS)。与血管成形术相比,TEC病例血管造影远端栓塞的发生率显著降低(3.9% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.005)。在血管造影显示移植物有血栓的病例中,TEC远端栓塞的发生率明显低于血管成形术(5.6% vs. 31.8%, P = 0.004)。在其他手术相关并发症的发生率方面,两组之间没有统计学差异,包括死亡、心肌梗死或紧急冠状动脉旁路移植术。在治疗隐静脉移植物时,TEC动脉粥样硬化切除术的远端栓塞发生率明显低于球囊血管成形术,特别是在血管造影上明显存在血栓的情况下。