Placement of multiple and different stent types for very long dissections during coronary angioplasty.

E Eeckhout, J C Stauffer, P Vogt, C Seydoux, J J Goy
{"title":"Placement of multiple and different stent types for very long dissections during coronary angioplasty.","authors":"E Eeckhout,&nbsp;J C Stauffer,&nbsp;P Vogt,&nbsp;C Seydoux,&nbsp;J J Goy","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199611)39:3<302::AID-CCD21>3.0.CO;2-F","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We have been investigating the safety and efficacy of multiple and different stent types placed in the unfavorable situation of a very long dissection (> 20 mm) after coronary angioplasty. We report our preliminary experience in 20 patients who were treated by the following combinations: Palmaz-Schatz and Micro stent (14 patients). Wallstent and Micro stent (4 patients); Wiktor and Micro stent (1 patient); and Palmaz-Schatz, Micro and Wallstent (1 patient). Normal distal flow was restored in all except one (no reflow phenomenon) patient and complete covering of the dissection was obtained in all but two patients. Event-free survival at 30 days was 90% (18 of 20 patients). During follow-up (mean period: 8 +/- 3 months), two patients died. Of the 18 other patients, 16 remained asymptomatic and free of complications. Symptomatic restenosis was treated by standard angioplasty in the two remaining patients. In conclusion, placement of different stent types seems a feasible, safe, and efficient treatment for very long dissections caused by standard angioplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":9664,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis","volume":"39 3","pages":"302-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199611)39:3<302::AID-CCD21>3.0.CO;2-F","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

We have been investigating the safety and efficacy of multiple and different stent types placed in the unfavorable situation of a very long dissection (> 20 mm) after coronary angioplasty. We report our preliminary experience in 20 patients who were treated by the following combinations: Palmaz-Schatz and Micro stent (14 patients). Wallstent and Micro stent (4 patients); Wiktor and Micro stent (1 patient); and Palmaz-Schatz, Micro and Wallstent (1 patient). Normal distal flow was restored in all except one (no reflow phenomenon) patient and complete covering of the dissection was obtained in all but two patients. Event-free survival at 30 days was 90% (18 of 20 patients). During follow-up (mean period: 8 +/- 3 months), two patients died. Of the 18 other patients, 16 remained asymptomatic and free of complications. Symptomatic restenosis was treated by standard angioplasty in the two remaining patients. In conclusion, placement of different stent types seems a feasible, safe, and efficient treatment for very long dissections caused by standard angioplasty.

冠状动脉成形术中长夹层放置多种不同类型的支架。
我们一直在研究冠状动脉成形术后夹层较长(> 20mm)的不利情况下放置多种不同类型支架的安全性和有效性。我们报告了20例患者的初步经验,他们接受了以下联合治疗:Palmaz-Schatz和Micro stent(14例)。Wallstent和Micro stent(4例);微支架(1例);Palmaz-Schatz, Micro and Wallstent(1例)。除1例患者(无回流现象)外,其余患者均恢复了正常的远端血流,除2例患者外,其余患者均获得了夹层的完全覆盖。30天无事件生存率为90%(20例患者中有18例)。随访期间(平均8 +/- 3个月),2例患者死亡。在其他18例患者中,16例无症状且无并发症。其余2例患者采用标准血管成形术治疗症状性再狭窄。总之,对于标准血管成形术引起的长时间夹层,放置不同类型的支架似乎是一种可行、安全和有效的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信