Comparative effectiveness of co-trimoxazole and tetracycline in the treatment of Cholera.

P Grados, N Bravo, C Battilana
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of co-trimoxazole and tetracycline in the treatment of Cholera.","authors":"P Grados,&nbsp;N Bravo,&nbsp;C Battilana","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of the study reported here was to compare the bactericidal effectiveness of tetracycline and co-trimoxazole (a combination of sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim) in treating cholera. The study, an open-ended random trial using adult patients with cholera cases confirmed by stool culture, was carried out in March 1993 at the Cholera Treatment Unit (CTU) of the Hospital de Apoyo Departmental María Auxiliadora in Lima, Peru. A total of 107 subjects were divided into two groups (A and B). The 50 in Group A received 500 mg of tetracycline orally every 6 hours for 3 days; the 57 in Group B received co-trimoxazole (160 mg of trimethoprim and 800 mg of sulfamethoxazole) orally every 12 hours for 3 days. The two groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, duration of symptoms prior to hospital admission, time at which antibiotic treatment was initiated, and clinical evolution. Control stool cultures of specimens obtained after treatment showed Vibrio cholerae O-1 present in 2% of the Group A and 12.3% of the Group B patients, and also showed V. cholerae non-O-1 present in 2% of the Group A patients and 3.5% of the Group B patients. Overall, it was concluded that both therapeutic treatment regimens were effective and that the strains of V. cholerae observed in the southern sector of the city of Lima were still susceptible to both antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":75654,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Pan American Health Organization","volume":"30 1","pages":"36-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Pan American Health Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study reported here was to compare the bactericidal effectiveness of tetracycline and co-trimoxazole (a combination of sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim) in treating cholera. The study, an open-ended random trial using adult patients with cholera cases confirmed by stool culture, was carried out in March 1993 at the Cholera Treatment Unit (CTU) of the Hospital de Apoyo Departmental María Auxiliadora in Lima, Peru. A total of 107 subjects were divided into two groups (A and B). The 50 in Group A received 500 mg of tetracycline orally every 6 hours for 3 days; the 57 in Group B received co-trimoxazole (160 mg of trimethoprim and 800 mg of sulfamethoxazole) orally every 12 hours for 3 days. The two groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, duration of symptoms prior to hospital admission, time at which antibiotic treatment was initiated, and clinical evolution. Control stool cultures of specimens obtained after treatment showed Vibrio cholerae O-1 present in 2% of the Group A and 12.3% of the Group B patients, and also showed V. cholerae non-O-1 present in 2% of the Group A patients and 3.5% of the Group B patients. Overall, it was concluded that both therapeutic treatment regimens were effective and that the strains of V. cholerae observed in the southern sector of the city of Lima were still susceptible to both antibiotics.

复方新诺明与四环素治疗霍乱的疗效比较。
本研究报告的目的是比较四环素和复方新诺明(磺胺甲恶唑和甲氧苄啶的组合)治疗霍乱的杀菌效果。这项研究是1993年3月在秘鲁利马阿波约省医院María Auxiliadora霍乱治疗科对经粪便培养证实的成年霍乱患者进行的一项开放式随机试验。将107例受试者分为A、B两组,A组50例,每6小时口服四环素500 mg,连用3天;B组57例给予复方新诺明(甲氧苄啶160 mg、磺胺甲恶唑800 mg),每12 h口服1次,连用3 d。两组在年龄、性别、入院前症状持续时间、开始抗生素治疗的时间和临床进展方面具有可比性。治疗后获得的对照粪便培养标本显示,2%的A组患者和12.3%的B组患者存在O-1型霍乱弧菌,2%的A组患者和3.5%的B组患者也存在非O-1型霍乱弧菌。总的来说,结论是两种治疗方案都是有效的,在利马市南部地区观察到的霍乱弧菌菌株仍然对这两种抗生素敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信