Evaluation of wound healing of the teatwith and without low level laser therapy in dairy cattle by laser doppler flowmetry in comparison with histopathology, tensiometry and hydroxyproline analysis

S.M. Ghamsari, J.A. Acorda, K. Taguchi, N. Abe, H. Yamada
{"title":"Evaluation of wound healing of the teatwith and without low level laser therapy in dairy cattle by laser doppler flowmetry in comparison with histopathology, tensiometry and hydroxyproline analysis","authors":"S.M. Ghamsari,&nbsp;J.A. Acorda,&nbsp;K. Taguchi,&nbsp;N. Abe,&nbsp;H. Yamada","doi":"10.1016/S0007-1935(96)80010-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Perforated teat wounds in eight lactating Holstein-Friesian cows wereclosed by four suture patterns with or without low level laser therapy (LLLT). Wound healing was evaluated by laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF), tensiometry and hydroxyproline analysis, and compared with histopathological examination. The three-layer pattern provided the best healing of the entire teat. Mucosal hyperplasia was observed in Gambee and continuous two-layer pattern while eversion of the skin, presence of suture tracts and a greater amount of granulation tissue were observed with the continuous and interrupted two-layer patterns. The epidermis in LLLT groups more closely resembled the normal epidermis, and collagen fibres were denser, thicker and better arranged in LLLT than in non-LLLT groups. LDF, tensiometry and hydroxyproline analysis correlated well with histopathological examination. The results suggest that LDF, a more rapid, less invasive and painless procedure, can replace tensile strength measurement or hydroxyproline analysis to assess the progress of teat wound healing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100203,"journal":{"name":"British Veterinary Journal","volume":"152 5","pages":"Pages 583-592"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0007-1935(96)80010-8","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007193596800108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Perforated teat wounds in eight lactating Holstein-Friesian cows wereclosed by four suture patterns with or without low level laser therapy (LLLT). Wound healing was evaluated by laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF), tensiometry and hydroxyproline analysis, and compared with histopathological examination. The three-layer pattern provided the best healing of the entire teat. Mucosal hyperplasia was observed in Gambee and continuous two-layer pattern while eversion of the skin, presence of suture tracts and a greater amount of granulation tissue were observed with the continuous and interrupted two-layer patterns. The epidermis in LLLT groups more closely resembled the normal epidermis, and collagen fibres were denser, thicker and better arranged in LLLT than in non-LLLT groups. LDF, tensiometry and hydroxyproline analysis correlated well with histopathological examination. The results suggest that LDF, a more rapid, less invasive and painless procedure, can replace tensile strength measurement or hydroxyproline analysis to assess the progress of teat wound healing.

用激光多普勒血流法评价低水平激光治疗前后奶牛伤口愈合情况,并与组织病理学、张力测量和羟脯氨酸分析进行比较
在低水平激光治疗(LLLT)的情况下,采用四种缝合方式缝合8头泌乳荷斯坦-弗里西亚奶牛穿孔的乳头伤口。采用激光多普勒血流仪(LDF)、张力仪和羟脯氨酸分析评估创面愈合情况,并与组织病理学检查进行比较。三层模式提供了最好的愈合整个乳头。Gambee呈连续两层型粘膜增生,连续两层型皮肤外翻、缝合束存在、肉芽组织增多。与非LLLT组相比,LLLT组的表皮更接近于正常表皮,胶原纤维密度更大、更厚、排列更好。LDF、张力测定和羟脯氨酸分析与组织病理学检查具有良好的相关性。结果表明,LDF是一种快速、无创、无痛的方法,可以取代拉伸强度测量或羟脯氨酸分析来评估伤口愈合的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信