The "half-age" stimulation strategy for ECT dosing.

Convulsive therapy Pub Date : 1996-09-01
G Petrides, M Fink
{"title":"The \"half-age\" stimulation strategy for ECT dosing.","authors":"G Petrides,&nbsp;M Fink","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Energy levels affect the treatment efficacy and efficiency of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). United States devices require preselection of energy dosage before stimulating patients, and two strategies have been proposed to determine an effective dosage, i.e., based on the patient's age and measured estimates of seizure threshold. The age method is criticized for overstimulation and an assumed association with increased cognitive effects. Threshold determination strategy is cumbersome and requires multiple stimulations, possibly placing patients at increased cardiovascular risk. In 35 patients, we examined an energy estimate for bilateral electrode placement at half the patient's age in \"percent of energy\" or joules delivered by the Thymatron and MECTA devices. Each patient required one stimulation in the first treatment to elicit motor seizures averaging 51.7 s. Subsequently, 20 patients were randomly assigned to either threshold titration followed by half-age for the first two treatments or the opposite (AB-BA design). Half-age energy was 7 J (30%) higher than titration estimates, corresponding to 55% energy of the age method. The relation of half-age and titration estimates were confirmed in energy dosing records from two independent centers. Energy dosing by half-age calculation in bilateral ECT is simple, practical, avoids overdosing and repeat stimulation, and is a useful substitute for the more complex strategy based on threshold estimation.</p>","PeriodicalId":79333,"journal":{"name":"Convulsive therapy","volume":"12 3","pages":"138-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Convulsive therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy levels affect the treatment efficacy and efficiency of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). United States devices require preselection of energy dosage before stimulating patients, and two strategies have been proposed to determine an effective dosage, i.e., based on the patient's age and measured estimates of seizure threshold. The age method is criticized for overstimulation and an assumed association with increased cognitive effects. Threshold determination strategy is cumbersome and requires multiple stimulations, possibly placing patients at increased cardiovascular risk. In 35 patients, we examined an energy estimate for bilateral electrode placement at half the patient's age in "percent of energy" or joules delivered by the Thymatron and MECTA devices. Each patient required one stimulation in the first treatment to elicit motor seizures averaging 51.7 s. Subsequently, 20 patients were randomly assigned to either threshold titration followed by half-age for the first two treatments or the opposite (AB-BA design). Half-age energy was 7 J (30%) higher than titration estimates, corresponding to 55% energy of the age method. The relation of half-age and titration estimates were confirmed in energy dosing records from two independent centers. Energy dosing by half-age calculation in bilateral ECT is simple, practical, avoids overdosing and repeat stimulation, and is a useful substitute for the more complex strategy based on threshold estimation.

电痉挛疗法的“半龄”刺激策略。
能量水平影响电休克治疗(ECT)的疗效和效率。美国的设备在刺激患者之前需要预先选择能量剂量,并且已经提出了两种策略来确定有效剂量,即根据患者的年龄和测量的癫痫阈值估计。年龄法因过度刺激和假定与认知效果增加有关而受到批评。阈值确定策略繁琐,需要多次刺激,可能使患者心血管风险增加。在35例患者中,我们检查了在患者一半年龄时双侧电极放置的能量估计,以胸腺管和MECTA装置传递的“能量百分比”或焦耳计算。在第一次治疗中,每位患者需要一次刺激才能引起平均51.7秒的运动癫痫发作。随后,20名患者被随机分配到前两种治疗的阈值滴定后半年龄或相反(AB-BA设计)。半龄能量比滴定法估计值高7 J(30%),相当于年龄法的55%能量。来自两个独立中心的能量给药记录证实了半龄和滴定估计的关系。在双侧电痉挛中,半龄计算能量给药简单、实用,避免了过量给药和重复刺激,是一种有效的替代基于阈值估计的更复杂的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书