P M Netten, H Wollersheim, P van den Broek, H F van der Heijden, T Thien
{"title":"Evaluation of two sympathetic cutaneous vasomotor reflexes using laser Doppler fluxmetry.","authors":"P M Netten, H Wollersheim, P van den Broek, H F van der Heijden, T Thien","doi":"10.1159/000179161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disturbances in sympathetic cutaneous vasomotor reflexes may be of pathogenetic importance in several microvascular problems. Laser Doppler fluxmetry (LDF) enables one to study the influence of sympathetic reflexes on skin blood flow. A matter of concern is the high variability of skin blood flow and its reactivity to sympathetic reflex test resulting in a poor reproducibility. In this study we evaluated two sympathetic stimulation tests, distant cooling and inspiratory gasp, and their influence on LDF-measured skin blood flow of the pulp of the big toe in 63 healthy volunteers. No age or sex dependency of the LDF test results was found. Absolute and relative LDF decrease during distant cooling was highly variable between the subjects (LDF decrease, mean +/-SD: 0.7 +/- 5.3%) compared to an LDF decrease of 46.5 +/- 3.1% during an inspiratory gasp test. The reproducibility, however, was better for the distant cooling test [coefficient of variation (CV): distant cooling: 5.8%, inspiratory gasp test: 35.4%]. With the use of a thermostatically controlled LDF probe holder fixed at a temperature of 36 degrees C, the short-term reproducibility of the two sympathetic vasomotor tests did not improve, probably because of a steady increase in baseline skin blood flow during the test. Surprisingly long-term variability of the percentage LDF decrease during the inspiratory gasp test, performed with the heated LDF probe, was lower compared to the short-term variability (CV 19.2 vs. 39.0%, p < 0.05). In conclusion to study sympathetic skin vasomotor reflexes with LDF, vasoconstriction during the inspiratory gasp test was more uniform compared to the distant cooling test, although the latter was more reproducible. Measuring skin blood flow reactivity with a heated LDF probe (36 degrees C) did not improve reproducibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":14035,"journal":{"name":"International journal of microcirculation, clinical and experimental","volume":"16 3","pages":"124-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000179161","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of microcirculation, clinical and experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000179161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Abstract
Disturbances in sympathetic cutaneous vasomotor reflexes may be of pathogenetic importance in several microvascular problems. Laser Doppler fluxmetry (LDF) enables one to study the influence of sympathetic reflexes on skin blood flow. A matter of concern is the high variability of skin blood flow and its reactivity to sympathetic reflex test resulting in a poor reproducibility. In this study we evaluated two sympathetic stimulation tests, distant cooling and inspiratory gasp, and their influence on LDF-measured skin blood flow of the pulp of the big toe in 63 healthy volunteers. No age or sex dependency of the LDF test results was found. Absolute and relative LDF decrease during distant cooling was highly variable between the subjects (LDF decrease, mean +/-SD: 0.7 +/- 5.3%) compared to an LDF decrease of 46.5 +/- 3.1% during an inspiratory gasp test. The reproducibility, however, was better for the distant cooling test [coefficient of variation (CV): distant cooling: 5.8%, inspiratory gasp test: 35.4%]. With the use of a thermostatically controlled LDF probe holder fixed at a temperature of 36 degrees C, the short-term reproducibility of the two sympathetic vasomotor tests did not improve, probably because of a steady increase in baseline skin blood flow during the test. Surprisingly long-term variability of the percentage LDF decrease during the inspiratory gasp test, performed with the heated LDF probe, was lower compared to the short-term variability (CV 19.2 vs. 39.0%, p < 0.05). In conclusion to study sympathetic skin vasomotor reflexes with LDF, vasoconstriction during the inspiratory gasp test was more uniform compared to the distant cooling test, although the latter was more reproducible. Measuring skin blood flow reactivity with a heated LDF probe (36 degrees C) did not improve reproducibility.