[Treatment and responsibility ethics in dealing with severely ill and dying patients--discussion stimulation].

E R Petzold
{"title":"[Treatment and responsibility ethics in dealing with severely ill and dying patients--discussion stimulation].","authors":"E R Petzold","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As we are approaching the end of this century, the implicit axiom which addresses the question of responsibility within the new territory of collaborative medical practising that was entered with high-tech medicine, has still to be put into new places. As for ethical theories, there is no such thing as a no mans land. All reflections will reach sooner or later the limits of language, and so will reflections on the ethics of action and the ethics of responsibility. According to Ludwig Wittgenstein we call running up against the limits of language ethics. In clinical psychosomatic medicine interacting with those who are severely ill and those who are dying everything is enmeshed: religion and philosophy, medicine, technology and language. For the ethics of action this is represented e.g. by a collective search for a consensus in clinical-psychosomatic case conferences. By the reassurance through others we can relate when being active to two imperatives by H.Y. Förster (1984): firstly, if you wish to understand, learn to act! Secondly, act always in a fashion that will open up new possibilities. In ethics of responsibility we can relate to the inheritance of monotheistic religions, upon the God of Israel and to tolerance.</p>","PeriodicalId":76859,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychoanalyse","volume":"42 1","pages":"88-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychoanalyse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As we are approaching the end of this century, the implicit axiom which addresses the question of responsibility within the new territory of collaborative medical practising that was entered with high-tech medicine, has still to be put into new places. As for ethical theories, there is no such thing as a no mans land. All reflections will reach sooner or later the limits of language, and so will reflections on the ethics of action and the ethics of responsibility. According to Ludwig Wittgenstein we call running up against the limits of language ethics. In clinical psychosomatic medicine interacting with those who are severely ill and those who are dying everything is enmeshed: religion and philosophy, medicine, technology and language. For the ethics of action this is represented e.g. by a collective search for a consensus in clinical-psychosomatic case conferences. By the reassurance through others we can relate when being active to two imperatives by H.Y. Förster (1984): firstly, if you wish to understand, learn to act! Secondly, act always in a fashion that will open up new possibilities. In ethics of responsibility we can relate to the inheritance of monotheistic religions, upon the God of Israel and to tolerance.

[处理危重病人和临终病人的治疗和责任伦理——讨论刺激]。
在我们接近本世纪末的时候,在高科技医学进入的合作医疗实践的新领域内解决责任问题的隐含公理仍有待于应用到新的地方。就伦理理论而言,不存在“无人区”这回事。所有的思考迟早都会达到语言的极限,对行动伦理和责任伦理的思考也是如此。根据路德维希·维特根斯坦的说法,我们称之为违背语言伦理的极限。在临床心身医学与重病患者和濒死患者的互动中,一切都被纠缠在一起:宗教和哲学,医学,技术和语言。对于行为伦理而言,这表现为在临床-心身病例会议上集体寻求共识。通过他人的安慰,我们可以在积极行动时与H.Y. Förster(1984)的两个要求联系起来:首先,如果你想要理解,就要学会行动!其次,总是以一种能开辟新的可能性的方式行事。在责任伦理方面,我们可以把一神论宗教的继承、以色列的上帝和宽容联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信