Peter D. Sly, Karen E. Willet, Sohei Kano, Celia J. Lanteri, Janet Wale
{"title":"Pirenzepine Blunts the Pulmonary Parenchymal Response to Inhaled Methacholine","authors":"Peter D. Sly, Karen E. Willet, Sohei Kano, Celia J. Lanteri, Janet Wale","doi":"10.1006/pulp.1995.1015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Summary: To determine the role of M1 muscarinic receptors in the response of the pulmonary parenchyma to inhaled methacholine (MCh), 20 mongrel, out-bred puppies, 8-10 weeks of age were challenged following pretreatment with either saline (control), UH-AH37 (a combined M1 & M3 receptor blocker), or pirenzepine (a relatively selective M1 receptor blocker). In addition, eight fox hound-beagle puppies, born and raised in a clean animal house, were studied. Relatively selective doses of pirenzepine produced a dose-dependent shift to the right of the parenchymal dose-response curves (<em>P</em>=0.031), with no effect on the airway dose-response curve (<em>P</em>=0.102). The fox hound-beagle puppies showed less parenchymal response (<em>P</em><0.0005), but equivalent airway response (<em>P</em>=0.468), to MCh compared with the mongrel puppies. High doses of pirenzepine (10000 μg/kg) and UH-AH37 (3 mg/kg) markedly inhibited both the parenchymal and airway responses to MCh. Data from the present study demonstrate that: (1) while both the airway and pulmonary parenchyma respond to inhaled MCh, the mechanisms by which they respond differ; (2) stimulation of M1 subtype muscarinic receptors are responsible, at least partly, for the parenchymal response; and (3) experimental conditions, such as the breed and housing conditions of animals, may have major influences on the parenchymal response to inhalational challenge tests.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74618,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary pharmacology","volume":"8 2","pages":"Pages 123-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1006/pulp.1995.1015","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952060085710150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21
Abstract
Summary: To determine the role of M1 muscarinic receptors in the response of the pulmonary parenchyma to inhaled methacholine (MCh), 20 mongrel, out-bred puppies, 8-10 weeks of age were challenged following pretreatment with either saline (control), UH-AH37 (a combined M1 & M3 receptor blocker), or pirenzepine (a relatively selective M1 receptor blocker). In addition, eight fox hound-beagle puppies, born and raised in a clean animal house, were studied. Relatively selective doses of pirenzepine produced a dose-dependent shift to the right of the parenchymal dose-response curves (P=0.031), with no effect on the airway dose-response curve (P=0.102). The fox hound-beagle puppies showed less parenchymal response (P<0.0005), but equivalent airway response (P=0.468), to MCh compared with the mongrel puppies. High doses of pirenzepine (10000 μg/kg) and UH-AH37 (3 mg/kg) markedly inhibited both the parenchymal and airway responses to MCh. Data from the present study demonstrate that: (1) while both the airway and pulmonary parenchyma respond to inhaled MCh, the mechanisms by which they respond differ; (2) stimulation of M1 subtype muscarinic receptors are responsible, at least partly, for the parenchymal response; and (3) experimental conditions, such as the breed and housing conditions of animals, may have major influences on the parenchymal response to inhalational challenge tests.