{"title":"[Degree of patient education retardation preoperative autologous blood donation at a university clinic].","authors":"W Nussbaumer, W Mayer, D Schönitzer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Uncovering the low degree of information in autologous blood donors for the purpose of implementation of corrective measures.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Questionnaire for autologous blood donors.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Department for Transfusion Medicine of a University Clinic.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>174 autologous blood donors, selected by their responsible physician between June 1, 1995 and August 1, 1995.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>64 (36.8%) of 174 patients who were admitted for withdrawal of autologous blood units had been informed by their treating physician, 100 (57.5%) of them came without any information and 10 (5.7%) on their own initiative. Of the 110 patients who had not been informed by their physician 16 declared to be sufficiently informed on risks or alternatives of allogeneic blood transfusion by mass media. Within the group of informed patients the percentage of those who did not fear allogeneic blood transfusions was clearly lower (23.4%) than within the group of uninformed patients (35.5%). Irrational fears were found less in informed than in uninformed patients (12.2% vs. 16.9%, informed vs. uninformed).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing numbers of patients are enrolled in allogeneic blood-saving programs, but still the degree of information does not seem to be sufficient. Because of the fact that information has to be given before the admission of the patient to the transfusion department, an enforced educational program on legal and medical issues of allogeneic blood transfusion for all medical disciplines involved is urgently required.</p>","PeriodicalId":13632,"journal":{"name":"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin","volume":"23 2","pages":"67-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Uncovering the low degree of information in autologous blood donors for the purpose of implementation of corrective measures.
Design: Questionnaire for autologous blood donors.
Setting: Department for Transfusion Medicine of a University Clinic.
Participants: 174 autologous blood donors, selected by their responsible physician between June 1, 1995 and August 1, 1995.
Results: 64 (36.8%) of 174 patients who were admitted for withdrawal of autologous blood units had been informed by their treating physician, 100 (57.5%) of them came without any information and 10 (5.7%) on their own initiative. Of the 110 patients who had not been informed by their physician 16 declared to be sufficiently informed on risks or alternatives of allogeneic blood transfusion by mass media. Within the group of informed patients the percentage of those who did not fear allogeneic blood transfusions was clearly lower (23.4%) than within the group of uninformed patients (35.5%). Irrational fears were found less in informed than in uninformed patients (12.2% vs. 16.9%, informed vs. uninformed).
Conclusions: Increasing numbers of patients are enrolled in allogeneic blood-saving programs, but still the degree of information does not seem to be sufficient. Because of the fact that information has to be given before the admission of the patient to the transfusion department, an enforced educational program on legal and medical issues of allogeneic blood transfusion for all medical disciplines involved is urgently required.
目的:揭示自体献血者信息知晓程度低的现状,为实施纠正措施提供依据。设计:自体献血者问卷调查。单位:某大学门诊输血医学科。参与者:174名自体献血者,由其负责的医生在1995年6月1日至1995年8月1日之间选择。结果:174例取血患者中64例(36.8%)患者事先被主治医师告知,100例(57.5%)患者事先未被告知,10例(5.7%)患者主动取血。在110名未被医生告知的患者中,有16名通过大众媒体表示已被充分告知异基因输血的风险或替代方法。在知情患者组中,不害怕输血的比例(23.4%)明显低于未知情患者组(35.5%)。知情患者的非理性恐惧少于不知情患者(12.2% vs. 16.9%,知情vs.不知情)。结论:越来越多的患者参加了异基因血液保存计划,但信息的程度似乎还不够。由于在病人进入输血部门之前必须提供信息,因此迫切需要在所有相关医学学科中实施关于同种异体输血的法律和医疗问题的强制教育方案。