The relative ability of three ictal EEG frequency bands to differentiate ECT seizures on the basis of electrode placement, stimulus intensity, and therapeutic response.

Convulsive therapy Pub Date : 1996-03-01
A D Krystal, R D Weiner, D Gassert, W V McCall, C E Coffey, T Sibert, T Holsinger
{"title":"The relative ability of three ictal EEG frequency bands to differentiate ECT seizures on the basis of electrode placement, stimulus intensity, and therapeutic response.","authors":"A D Krystal,&nbsp;R D Weiner,&nbsp;D Gassert,&nbsp;W V McCall,&nbsp;C E Coffey,&nbsp;T Sibert,&nbsp;T Holsinger","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ictal EEG indices show promise for separating individual ECT seizures on the basis of treatment electrode placement (ELPL), relative stimulus intensity (Dose), and expected therapeutic response. One factor impeding the effective clinical implementation of ictal EEG indices for these purposes is uncertainty as to the relative utility of lower and higher frequency EEG activity. Recent articles are contradictory in this regard, but no data exist addressing this issue. As a result, we reanalyzed data from 44 subjects in two studies and compared the relative ability of ictal EEG data in three frequency bands to differentiate seizures as a function of ELPL, Dose, and therapeutic response. We found that the frequency band that best differentiated these groups depended on the EEG measure used, the temporal portion of the seizure, and whether ELPL, Dose, or therapeutic response was being compared.</p>","PeriodicalId":79333,"journal":{"name":"Convulsive therapy","volume":"12 1","pages":"13-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Convulsive therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ictal EEG indices show promise for separating individual ECT seizures on the basis of treatment electrode placement (ELPL), relative stimulus intensity (Dose), and expected therapeutic response. One factor impeding the effective clinical implementation of ictal EEG indices for these purposes is uncertainty as to the relative utility of lower and higher frequency EEG activity. Recent articles are contradictory in this regard, but no data exist addressing this issue. As a result, we reanalyzed data from 44 subjects in two studies and compared the relative ability of ictal EEG data in three frequency bands to differentiate seizures as a function of ELPL, Dose, and therapeutic response. We found that the frequency band that best differentiated these groups depended on the EEG measure used, the temporal portion of the seizure, and whether ELPL, Dose, or therapeutic response was being compared.

在电极放置、刺激强度和治疗反应的基础上,三个头期脑电图频带鉴别ECT发作的相对能力。
根据治疗电极放置(ELPL)、相对刺激强度(剂量)和预期的治疗反应,颅电图指标有望分离个体电痉挛发作。阻碍临床有效实施颅电指标的一个因素是低频和高频脑电图活动的相对效用的不确定性。最近的文章在这方面是矛盾的,但没有数据存在解决这个问题。因此,我们重新分析了两项研究中44名受试者的数据,并比较了三个频带的初始脑电图数据作为ELPL、剂量和治疗反应的函数来区分癫痫发作的相对能力。我们发现,区分这些组的最佳频带取决于所使用的脑电图测量、癫痫发作的时间部分,以及是否比较ELPL、剂量或治疗反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书