[Comparison of miniplate and lag screw osteosynthesis in treatment of collum fractures].

A N Hachem, T Hierl, S Schmidt, A Hemprich
{"title":"[Comparison of miniplate and lag screw osteosynthesis in treatment of collum fractures].","authors":"A N Hachem,&nbsp;T Hierl,&nbsp;S Schmidt,&nbsp;A Hemprich","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The question whether- and if by which means-operative reconstruction of condylar process fractures is appropriate is still unresolved. This study was initiated to compare osteosynthesis of low dislocated and/or luxated condylar fractures by means of miniplates or lag screws according to Eckelt. 22 patients participated, 16 being treated with miniplate osteosynthesis, 6 with lag screws. Investigation concentrated on the parameters TMJ-function (side shift in dynamic and static occlusion, maximum interincisal distance, impairment of pro- and laterotrusion), radiologic post-operative fragment position, intra- and postoperative complications, and evaluation by the patients. Miniplate osteosynthesis showed better results leading in 80% to an unimpaired TMJ function compared to 50% of the lag screw group. Miniplate osteosynthesis was performed faster. No intra- or postoperative problems occurred in contrary to the lag screw, where one fracture of the screw intra- and one post-operatively were noted. Even if the numbers are too small for statistical calculations, trends are shown favouring miniplate osteosynthesis for operative reconstruction of condylar fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":75863,"journal":{"name":"Fortschritte der Kiefer- und Gesichts-Chirurgie","volume":"41 ","pages":"131-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fortschritte der Kiefer- und Gesichts-Chirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The question whether- and if by which means-operative reconstruction of condylar process fractures is appropriate is still unresolved. This study was initiated to compare osteosynthesis of low dislocated and/or luxated condylar fractures by means of miniplates or lag screws according to Eckelt. 22 patients participated, 16 being treated with miniplate osteosynthesis, 6 with lag screws. Investigation concentrated on the parameters TMJ-function (side shift in dynamic and static occlusion, maximum interincisal distance, impairment of pro- and laterotrusion), radiologic post-operative fragment position, intra- and postoperative complications, and evaluation by the patients. Miniplate osteosynthesis showed better results leading in 80% to an unimpaired TMJ function compared to 50% of the lag screw group. Miniplate osteosynthesis was performed faster. No intra- or postoperative problems occurred in contrary to the lag screw, where one fracture of the screw intra- and one post-operatively were noted. Even if the numbers are too small for statistical calculations, trends are shown favouring miniplate osteosynthesis for operative reconstruction of condylar fractures.

[微型钢板与拉力螺钉内固定治疗脊柱骨折的比较]。
髁突骨折手术重建是否合适,以及以何种方式进行手术重建的问题仍未解决。根据Eckelt的研究,本研究的目的是比较微型钢板或拉力螺钉对低位脱位和/或脱位髁骨折的植骨效果。22例患者参与了研究,其中16例采用微型钢板植骨,6例采用拉力螺钉。调查主要集中在tmj功能参数(动态和静态咬合侧移、最大切间距离、前突和侧突损害)、术后碎片位置、术中和术后并发症以及患者评价。与拉力螺钉组的50%相比,微型钢板接骨术显示出更好的结果,80%的患者未受损TMJ功能。微型钢板内固定更快。与拉力螺钉不同的是,拉力螺钉在手术中和术后均未发生骨折。即使数字太小,无法进行统计计算,但趋势表明微型钢板接骨术在髁突骨折手术重建中更受欢迎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信