Limited applicability of the DATEX Reloxograph in diabetics with peripheral polyneuropathy.

D Knüttgen, W Burgwinkel, K Z Nieden, M Jahn, M R Müller-Gorges, M Doehn
{"title":"Limited applicability of the DATEX Reloxograph in diabetics with peripheral polyneuropathy.","authors":"D Knüttgen,&nbsp;W Burgwinkel,&nbsp;K Z Nieden,&nbsp;M Jahn,&nbsp;M R Müller-Gorges,&nbsp;M Doehn","doi":"10.1007/BF02918208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the study was to investigate whether peripheral nerve dysfunction can influence the applicability of the DATEX Relaxograph in diabetics. Sixty two patients (43 diabetics, 19 non-diabetics) undergoing ophthalmosurgical procedures under general anesthesia were tested. The distal motor latency (DML) of the ulnar nerve served as a graduation tool for peripheral nerve dysfunction. The patients were divided in three groups: non-diabetics (group 1), diabetics with DML < 3.8 msec (group 2), diabetics with DML > 3.8 msec (group 3). Relaxometry was performed by stimulating the right ulnar nerve near the wrist, and the evoked response (EMG) was obtained from the hypothenar muscle. Calibration of the device (i.e. supramaximal stimulation within the given current range of a maximum of 70 mA) was carried out successfully in most patients of group 1 and 2 (94.7% and 85.7% respectively). In contrast to that calibration could be carried out in only 40.9% of the patients of group 3 (P < 0.01 vs. group 1 and 2). Consequently in a high percentage (59.1%) of the patients of group 3 relaxometry had to be performed in an uncalibrated manner. The results substantiate the hypothesis that peripheral nerve dysfunction can restrict the applicability of the Relaxograph in diabetics.</p>","PeriodicalId":77181,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical monitoring and computing","volume":"13 1","pages":"21-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02918208","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical monitoring and computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02918208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate whether peripheral nerve dysfunction can influence the applicability of the DATEX Relaxograph in diabetics. Sixty two patients (43 diabetics, 19 non-diabetics) undergoing ophthalmosurgical procedures under general anesthesia were tested. The distal motor latency (DML) of the ulnar nerve served as a graduation tool for peripheral nerve dysfunction. The patients were divided in three groups: non-diabetics (group 1), diabetics with DML < 3.8 msec (group 2), diabetics with DML > 3.8 msec (group 3). Relaxometry was performed by stimulating the right ulnar nerve near the wrist, and the evoked response (EMG) was obtained from the hypothenar muscle. Calibration of the device (i.e. supramaximal stimulation within the given current range of a maximum of 70 mA) was carried out successfully in most patients of group 1 and 2 (94.7% and 85.7% respectively). In contrast to that calibration could be carried out in only 40.9% of the patients of group 3 (P < 0.01 vs. group 1 and 2). Consequently in a high percentage (59.1%) of the patients of group 3 relaxometry had to be performed in an uncalibrated manner. The results substantiate the hypothesis that peripheral nerve dysfunction can restrict the applicability of the Relaxograph in diabetics.

DATEX Reloxograph在伴有周围多发性神经病变的糖尿病患者中的有限适用性。
本研究的目的是探讨周围神经功能障碍是否会影响DATEX松弛仪在糖尿病患者中的适用性。本文对62例患者(糖尿病43例,非糖尿病19例)在全身麻醉下进行眼科手术。尺神经远端运动潜伏期(DML)可作为周围神经功能障碍的分级工具。将患者分为3组:非糖尿病患者(1组)、DML < 3.8 msec的糖尿病患者(2组)、DML > 3.8 msec的糖尿病患者(3组)。通过刺激腕部附近的右侧尺神经进行松弛测量,并从鱼际下肌获得诱发反应(EMG)。第1组和第2组的大多数患者(分别为94.7%和85.7%)成功地进行了设备校准(即在最大70 mA的给定电流范围内进行超极大刺激)。相比之下,第3组只有40.9%的患者可以进行校准(P < 0.01,与第1组和第2组相比)。因此,第3组有很高比例(59.1%)的患者必须以未校准的方式进行舒张测量。结果证实了周围神经功能障碍可能限制舒张仪在糖尿病患者中的适用性的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信