Clinical experience with iobitridol 250-300 in digital subtraction angiography. Double-blind randomized studies vs. iopromide and iohexol.

Acta radiologica. Supplementum Pub Date : 1996-01-01
J C Bouard, D Lyonnet, J P Illes, C Bouard-Monnier, O Rouviere, C Pangaud
{"title":"Clinical experience with iobitridol 250-300 in digital subtraction angiography. Double-blind randomized studies vs. iopromide and iohexol.","authors":"J C Bouard,&nbsp;D Lyonnet,&nbsp;J P Illes,&nbsp;C Bouard-Monnier,&nbsp;O Rouviere,&nbsp;C Pangaud","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Iobitridol was clinically tested in DSA against iopromide (i.v. DSA) or iohexol (i.a. DSA) in 139 patients. Seven patients participated in the i.v. DSA trial and 60 in the i.a. DSA study. Each examination was rated as diagnostic or not and the image quality was noted. Nature, onset, intensity and outcome of each adverse reaction were recorded. There was no significant difference in imaging quality and side effect occurrence between the 2 groups. We conclude that iobitridol is a safe and efficient contrast medium, which can be recommended for DSA examinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7159,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica. Supplementum","volume":"400 ","pages":"85-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Iobitridol was clinically tested in DSA against iopromide (i.v. DSA) or iohexol (i.a. DSA) in 139 patients. Seven patients participated in the i.v. DSA trial and 60 in the i.a. DSA study. Each examination was rated as diagnostic or not and the image quality was noted. Nature, onset, intensity and outcome of each adverse reaction were recorded. There was no significant difference in imaging quality and side effect occurrence between the 2 groups. We conclude that iobitridol is a safe and efficient contrast medium, which can be recommended for DSA examinations.

碘比妥250 ~ 300在数字减影血管造影中的临床应用体会。双盲随机研究对比碘丙胺和碘己醇。
对139例患者进行了碘比替醇与碘丙咪啶(不含DSA)或碘己醇(不含DSA)的DSA临床试验。7名患者参加了静脉注射DSA试验,60名患者参加了静脉注射DSA研究。每次检查被评为诊断性或非诊断性,并记录图像质量。记录各不良反应的性质、发生、强度及转归。两组患者的影像质量及不良反应发生率无显著差异。结论:碘比啶醇是一种安全有效的造影剂,可推荐用于DSA检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信