Venomous snake bite without clinical envenoming ('dry-bite'). A neglected problem in Brazil.

Tropical and geographical medicine Pub Date : 1995-01-01
P V Silveira, S de A Nishioka
{"title":"Venomous snake bite without clinical envenoming ('dry-bite'). A neglected problem in Brazil.","authors":"P V Silveira,&nbsp;S de A Nishioka","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Venomous snake bite without envenoming ('dry-bite') has been recognized throughout the world, but neglected in the Brazilian literature. Forty cases of patients bitten by venomous snakes of the genera Bothrops (lance-headed vipers) and Crotalus (South American rattlesnakes), confirmed by identification of the captured or dead snake, were seen in a 34-month prospective study carried out in a teaching hospital in southeastern Brazil. Out of the 33 cases of lance-headed viper and 7 of rattlesnake bite, respectively 10 (30.3%) and 3 (42.9%) had no clinical or laboratory evidence of local or systemic envenoming. Both within the Bothrops and Crotalus groups, there was no significant difference in sex and age of the patients, and time between bite and medical assistance between the patients who had from those who did not have clinical envenoming. The high prevalence of 'dry-bite' in this study may have several possible explanations, and has implications on the indication of antivenom for the treatment of venomous snake bite. Antivenom administration may be postponed or even not indicated for victims of snake bite presenting no manifestations of local or systemic envenoming.</p>","PeriodicalId":76765,"journal":{"name":"Tropical and geographical medicine","volume":"47 2","pages":"82-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical and geographical medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Venomous snake bite without envenoming ('dry-bite') has been recognized throughout the world, but neglected in the Brazilian literature. Forty cases of patients bitten by venomous snakes of the genera Bothrops (lance-headed vipers) and Crotalus (South American rattlesnakes), confirmed by identification of the captured or dead snake, were seen in a 34-month prospective study carried out in a teaching hospital in southeastern Brazil. Out of the 33 cases of lance-headed viper and 7 of rattlesnake bite, respectively 10 (30.3%) and 3 (42.9%) had no clinical or laboratory evidence of local or systemic envenoming. Both within the Bothrops and Crotalus groups, there was no significant difference in sex and age of the patients, and time between bite and medical assistance between the patients who had from those who did not have clinical envenoming. The high prevalence of 'dry-bite' in this study may have several possible explanations, and has implications on the indication of antivenom for the treatment of venomous snake bite. Antivenom administration may be postponed or even not indicated for victims of snake bite presenting no manifestations of local or systemic envenoming.

毒蛇咬伤而无临床毒性(“干咬”)。巴西的一个被忽视的问题。
毒蛇咬伤无毒液(“干咬”)已经在世界各地得到认可,但在巴西文献中被忽视。在巴西东南部的一家教学医院进行的一项为期34个月的前瞻性研究中,发现了40例被Bothrops属(矛头毒蛇)和Crotalus属(南美响尾蛇)毒蛇咬伤的患者,通过对捕获或死蛇的鉴定证实了这一点。矛头毒蛇咬伤33例,响尾蛇咬伤7例,分别有10例(30.3%)和3例(42.9%)临床或实验室无局部或全身咬伤证据。在Bothrops组和Crotalus组中,在患者的性别和年龄以及有和没有临床中毒的患者被咬和接受医疗救助之间的时间上没有显着差异。在这项研究中,“干咬伤”的高流行率可能有几种可能的解释,并对抗蛇毒血清治疗毒蛇咬伤的适应症有影响。抗蛇毒血清管理可能被推迟,甚至不表明蛇咬伤的受害者没有表现出局部或全身的中毒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信