Acute allergic disease in a hospital emergency room: a retrospective evaluation of one year's experience.

H J Schwartz
{"title":"Acute allergic disease in a hospital emergency room: a retrospective evaluation of one year's experience.","authors":"H J Schwartz","doi":"10.2500/108854195778702639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Efforts at understanding the patterns and prevalence rates of various causes of anaphylaxis are needed. This report is a first effort to address the issue and review the experiences of one voluntary hospital emergency room, where records from 326 (1.4%) of 23,647 emergency room reports for 1992 were analyzed. These results are compared to other already published results. Further study, on a national basis, is clearly necessary. It was remarkable that only 13/48 (27%) bee sting allergic patients were given self-injectable epinephrine and only 6/48 (12.5%) of these patients were referred to an allergist. Further, none of 165 other patients was referred to an allergist.</p>","PeriodicalId":7423,"journal":{"name":"Allergy proceedings : the official journal of regional and state allergy societies","volume":"16 5","pages":"247-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2500/108854195778702639","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy proceedings : the official journal of regional and state allergy societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/108854195778702639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Efforts at understanding the patterns and prevalence rates of various causes of anaphylaxis are needed. This report is a first effort to address the issue and review the experiences of one voluntary hospital emergency room, where records from 326 (1.4%) of 23,647 emergency room reports for 1992 were analyzed. These results are compared to other already published results. Further study, on a national basis, is clearly necessary. It was remarkable that only 13/48 (27%) bee sting allergic patients were given self-injectable epinephrine and only 6/48 (12.5%) of these patients were referred to an allergist. Further, none of 165 other patients was referred to an allergist.

急性过敏性疾病在医院急诊室:回顾性评价一年的经验。
需要努力了解各种过敏性反应原因的模式和患病率。本报告是解决这一问题的首次努力,并审查了一家自愿医院急诊室的经验,该报告分析了1992年23,647份急诊室报告中的326份(1.4%)记录。这些结果与其他已经发表的结果进行了比较。显然有必要在全国范围内进行进一步的研究。值得注意的是,只有13/48(27%)的蜜蜂蜇伤过敏患者给予自我注射肾上腺素,只有6/48(12.5%)的患者转诊给过敏专科医生。此外,165名其他患者中没有人被转介给过敏症专科医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信