Comparison of 4- and 24-hour intravenous infusion schedules for granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor.

L Wong, C W Taylor, E Radwanski, E M Hersh, S E Salmon
{"title":"Comparison of 4- and 24-hour intravenous infusion schedules for granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor.","authors":"L Wong, C W Taylor, E Radwanski, E M Hersh, S E Salmon","doi":"10.1097/00002371-199507000-00008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We evaluated the toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and biologic activity of 4- versus 24-h intravenous infusions of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhuGM-CSF) in patients with advanced malignancy. The doses of rhuGM-CSF evaluated were 1, 3, 5, and 10 μg/kg administered by 4- or 24-h infusion for 10 days. A total of 32 patients was treated (17, 4-h infusion ; 15, 24-h infusion). Toxicities seen with both schedules included fever, chills, nausea, emesis, fatigue, and pain. Other observations in the 4-h infusion group included pulmonary edema and bone pain and in the 24-h infusion group, leukocytosis and atrial fibrillation. Pharmacokinetic data for the 4-h infusion showed C max and area under the curve (AUC) increased with dose, and the terminal elimination half-life varied from 0.7 to 1.1 h. Comparative pharmacokinetic assessment of the 24-h infusion was difficult because of low steady-state plasma concentrations. Hematologic effects in the 24-h infusion group included a dose-dependent increase in total white blood cells and absolute granulocyte count, generally greater than those in the 4-h infusion group. In summary, a greater biologic effect occurred in the 24-h infusion group than in the 4-h infusion group. The toxicity profile differed slightly between the 4- and 24-h infusion groups, but both were generally well tolerated by patients.","PeriodicalId":79346,"journal":{"name":"Journal of immunotherapy with emphasis on tumor immunology : official journal of the Society for Biological Therapy","volume":"18 1","pages":"57-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00002371-199507000-00008","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of immunotherapy with emphasis on tumor immunology : official journal of the Society for Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00002371-199507000-00008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We evaluated the toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and biologic activity of 4- versus 24-h intravenous infusions of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhuGM-CSF) in patients with advanced malignancy. The doses of rhuGM-CSF evaluated were 1, 3, 5, and 10 μg/kg administered by 4- or 24-h infusion for 10 days. A total of 32 patients was treated (17, 4-h infusion ; 15, 24-h infusion). Toxicities seen with both schedules included fever, chills, nausea, emesis, fatigue, and pain. Other observations in the 4-h infusion group included pulmonary edema and bone pain and in the 24-h infusion group, leukocytosis and atrial fibrillation. Pharmacokinetic data for the 4-h infusion showed C max and area under the curve (AUC) increased with dose, and the terminal elimination half-life varied from 0.7 to 1.1 h. Comparative pharmacokinetic assessment of the 24-h infusion was difficult because of low steady-state plasma concentrations. Hematologic effects in the 24-h infusion group included a dose-dependent increase in total white blood cells and absolute granulocyte count, generally greater than those in the 4-h infusion group. In summary, a greater biologic effect occurred in the 24-h infusion group than in the 4-h infusion group. The toxicity profile differed slightly between the 4- and 24-h infusion groups, but both were generally well tolerated by patients.
粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子4小时和24小时静脉输注方案的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信