Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis and tuberculosis epidemiology.

J E Gómez Marín, L Rigouts, L E Villegas Londoño, F Portaels
{"title":"Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis and tuberculosis epidemiology.","authors":"J E Gómez Marín,&nbsp;L Rigouts,&nbsp;L E Villegas Londoño,&nbsp;F Portaels","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In order to study polymorphisms of the DNA insertion sequence 6110 (IS6110) in Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated from Colombian patients, together with resistance to antituberculous medications in the Department of Quindío, Colombia, a prospective study was conducted using a consecutive sample of 59 patients with symptomatic pulmonary tuberculosis whose cases had been confirmed by bacilloscopy, both with and without a history of treatment. The patients, who were participating in the Tuberculosis Control Program of the Regional Health Institute of Quindío in Armenia, included all individuals attending local health centers and hospitals between March and July 1993 who were referred to the regional institute. Sputum specimens from each patient were cultured and subjected to drug sensitivity tests. Subsequently, restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) of IS6110 from 27 patients were analyzed. The patients' treatment histories were used to classify their cases according to WHO criteria. Forty-five cultures were found positive, 44 for M. tuberculosis and 1 for M. africanum. Initial drug resistance was observed in 4 of 42 new cases, or 9.5% (95% CI: 0.6, 18), 2 showing resistance to isoniazid (INH) and 2 to isoniazid plus streptomycin (INH-SM). Acquired resistance was observed in 2 of the 3 chronic cases and relapses, the bacteria being resistant to isoniazid, rifampicin, and streptomycin (INH-RM-SM) in one case and to isoniazid, ethambutol, rifampicin, and streptomycin (INH-EMB-RM-SM) in the other. In those 27 strains subjected to RFLP analysis, the number of copies of IS6110 ranged from 6 to 17. Similarity coefficients revealed five distinct groups of strains. Overall, the RFLP analysis permitted most of the strains to be distinguished from one another, implying that the polymorphisms involved are sufficient to permit effective employment of this technique, which appears to have considerable potential for use in epidemiologic studies and in work designed to provide a basis for tuberculosis control program decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":75654,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Pan American Health Organization","volume":"29 3","pages":"226-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Pan American Health Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to study polymorphisms of the DNA insertion sequence 6110 (IS6110) in Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated from Colombian patients, together with resistance to antituberculous medications in the Department of Quindío, Colombia, a prospective study was conducted using a consecutive sample of 59 patients with symptomatic pulmonary tuberculosis whose cases had been confirmed by bacilloscopy, both with and without a history of treatment. The patients, who were participating in the Tuberculosis Control Program of the Regional Health Institute of Quindío in Armenia, included all individuals attending local health centers and hospitals between March and July 1993 who were referred to the regional institute. Sputum specimens from each patient were cultured and subjected to drug sensitivity tests. Subsequently, restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) of IS6110 from 27 patients were analyzed. The patients' treatment histories were used to classify their cases according to WHO criteria. Forty-five cultures were found positive, 44 for M. tuberculosis and 1 for M. africanum. Initial drug resistance was observed in 4 of 42 new cases, or 9.5% (95% CI: 0.6, 18), 2 showing resistance to isoniazid (INH) and 2 to isoniazid plus streptomycin (INH-SM). Acquired resistance was observed in 2 of the 3 chronic cases and relapses, the bacteria being resistant to isoniazid, rifampicin, and streptomycin (INH-RM-SM) in one case and to isoniazid, ethambutol, rifampicin, and streptomycin (INH-EMB-RM-SM) in the other. In those 27 strains subjected to RFLP analysis, the number of copies of IS6110 ranged from 6 to 17. Similarity coefficients revealed five distinct groups of strains. Overall, the RFLP analysis permitted most of the strains to be distinguished from one another, implying that the polymorphisms involved are sufficient to permit effective employment of this technique, which appears to have considerable potential for use in epidemiologic studies and in work designed to provide a basis for tuberculosis control program decision-making.

限制性内切片段长度多态性(RFLP)分析与结核流行病学。
为了研究从哥伦比亚患者分离的结核分枝杆菌菌株中DNA插入序列6110 (IS6110)的多态性,以及哥伦比亚Quindío部门抗结核药物的耐药性,对59例经杆菌镜检查确诊的有症状肺结核患者进行了一项前瞻性研究,这些患者有或没有治疗史。参加亚美尼亚Quindío区域卫生研究所结核病控制方案的病人包括1993年3月至7月期间在当地卫生中心和医院就诊的所有转介到区域卫生研究所的个人。对每位患者的痰标本进行培养并进行药敏试验。随后,分析了27例患者的IS6110限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)。根据世卫组织标准,利用患者的治疗史对其病例进行分类。45例培养呈阳性,44例为结核分枝杆菌,1例为非洲分枝杆菌。42例新发病例中有4例出现初始耐药,占9.5% (95% CI: 0.6, 18), 2例对异烟肼(INH)耐药,2例对异烟肼加链霉素(INH- sm)耐药。3例慢性病例中2例出现获得性耐药并复发,1例对异烟肼、利福平、链霉素耐药(INH-RM-SM), 1例对异烟肼、乙胺丁醇、利福平、链霉素耐药(INH-EMB-RM-SM)。在27株RFLP分析菌株中,IS6110的拷贝数在6 ~ 17个之间。相似系数显示了5个不同的菌株群。总的来说,RFLP分析允许大多数菌株彼此区分,这意味着所涉及的多态性足以允许有效地使用这种技术,这似乎在流行病学研究和为结核病控制计划决策提供基础的工作中具有相当大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信