The statistical power of family practice research.

Family practice research journal Pub Date : 1993-06-01
M B Mengel, A B Davis
{"title":"The statistical power of family practice research.","authors":"M B Mengel,&nbsp;A B Davis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To determine the statistical power of family practice research, we conducted a survey of all family practice studies published in 3 major family practice journals in 1988. Only 5 of 86 studies calculated statistical power, although 67 (78%) reported statistically nonsignificant results. Calculations of statistical power revealed that more than 80% of family practice studies had sufficient statistical power to detect medium to large effect sizes, but not small effect sizes, which some readers might deem clinically important. We conclude that the authors of family practice research studies do not pay enough attention to the issue of statistical power when reporting statistically nonsignificant results, leaving their readers in doubt as to whether a clinically significant effect could have been detected.</p>","PeriodicalId":77127,"journal":{"name":"Family practice research journal","volume":"13 2","pages":"105-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To determine the statistical power of family practice research, we conducted a survey of all family practice studies published in 3 major family practice journals in 1988. Only 5 of 86 studies calculated statistical power, although 67 (78%) reported statistically nonsignificant results. Calculations of statistical power revealed that more than 80% of family practice studies had sufficient statistical power to detect medium to large effect sizes, but not small effect sizes, which some readers might deem clinically important. We conclude that the authors of family practice research studies do not pay enough attention to the issue of statistical power when reporting statistically nonsignificant results, leaving their readers in doubt as to whether a clinically significant effect could have been detected.

家庭实践研究的统计效力。
为了确定家庭实践研究的统计效力,我们对1988年发表在3家主要家庭实践期刊上的所有家庭实践研究进行了调查。86项研究中只有5项计算了统计效力,尽管67项(78%)报告了统计上不显著的结果。统计能力的计算显示,超过80%的家庭实践研究具有足够的统计能力来检测中大型效应量,但不包括一些读者可能认为具有临床重要性的小效应量。我们的结论是,家庭实践研究的作者在报告统计上不显著的结果时,没有足够重视统计能力的问题,使他们的读者对是否可以检测到临床显著的影响产生怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信