Quantitative two-dimensional electrophoretic detection of possible urinary protein biomarkers of occupational exposure to cadmium.

J E Myrick, S P Caudill, M K Robinson, I L Hubert
{"title":"Quantitative two-dimensional electrophoretic detection of possible urinary protein biomarkers of occupational exposure to cadmium.","authors":"J E Myrick,&nbsp;S P Caudill,&nbsp;M K Robinson,&nbsp;I L Hubert","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To search for new urinary protein biomarkers of cadmium toxicity, we used quantitative two-dimensional electrophoresis (2DE) and analysed urine samples from 18 male cadmium recovery plant employees whose mean age was 47 +/- 15.6 years (+/- 1 SD) and whose urine cadmium levels ranged from 0.14 microgram l-1 to 20.4 micrograms l-1 (0.06-37.1 micrograms g-1 creatinine). Image analysis of the silver-stained gels yielded intensity (concentration) values for a mean number, per person, of 825 +/- 184 urinary proteins (spots) and found 596 +/- 218 matched proteins (the same proteins in two or more gels) per person. Total urinary protein and the sum of all spot intensities were positively correlated (P = 0.0447 and P = 0.0616, respectively) with urinary cadmium (UCD), as measured by atomic absorption spectroscopy. The combined sum of the intensities of all acidic proteins with a relative molecular weight (M(r)) below 40 kDa was correlated with UCD (P = 0.0461), revealing a low M(r), acidic proteinuria as UCD increased. Multiple hypothesis testing by regression analysis of the intensities of matched proteins with UCD revealed 14 unidentified proteins that were considered candidates for biomarkers of cadmium exposure. The best two candidate proteins--those having M(r)s of less than 13.9 kDa and relative glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDHr) coordinates of -19.7 and -27.2--were excellently resolved in the 2DE gels, and their intensities increased by 323% and 857%, respectively, over the UCD range that was tested. Two other proteins with M(r)s of 23.9 kDa and 29.2 kDa and with acidic net charges were not as well resolved. Six very acidic proteins, with M(r)s ranging from 88.8 to 90.7 kDa and with intensities highly correlated with UCD, appeared to be related and were resolved as a 'charge train' (a group of related proteins, or isoforms, differing only by small changes in net charge). Four proteins appeared to increase only when the UCD concentration was above a threshold of 16 micrograms l-1.</p>","PeriodicalId":77007,"journal":{"name":"Applied and theoretical electrophoresis : the official journal of the International Electrophoresis Society","volume":"3 3-4","pages":"137-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied and theoretical electrophoresis : the official journal of the International Electrophoresis Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To search for new urinary protein biomarkers of cadmium toxicity, we used quantitative two-dimensional electrophoresis (2DE) and analysed urine samples from 18 male cadmium recovery plant employees whose mean age was 47 +/- 15.6 years (+/- 1 SD) and whose urine cadmium levels ranged from 0.14 microgram l-1 to 20.4 micrograms l-1 (0.06-37.1 micrograms g-1 creatinine). Image analysis of the silver-stained gels yielded intensity (concentration) values for a mean number, per person, of 825 +/- 184 urinary proteins (spots) and found 596 +/- 218 matched proteins (the same proteins in two or more gels) per person. Total urinary protein and the sum of all spot intensities were positively correlated (P = 0.0447 and P = 0.0616, respectively) with urinary cadmium (UCD), as measured by atomic absorption spectroscopy. The combined sum of the intensities of all acidic proteins with a relative molecular weight (M(r)) below 40 kDa was correlated with UCD (P = 0.0461), revealing a low M(r), acidic proteinuria as UCD increased. Multiple hypothesis testing by regression analysis of the intensities of matched proteins with UCD revealed 14 unidentified proteins that were considered candidates for biomarkers of cadmium exposure. The best two candidate proteins--those having M(r)s of less than 13.9 kDa and relative glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDHr) coordinates of -19.7 and -27.2--were excellently resolved in the 2DE gels, and their intensities increased by 323% and 857%, respectively, over the UCD range that was tested. Two other proteins with M(r)s of 23.9 kDa and 29.2 kDa and with acidic net charges were not as well resolved. Six very acidic proteins, with M(r)s ranging from 88.8 to 90.7 kDa and with intensities highly correlated with UCD, appeared to be related and were resolved as a 'charge train' (a group of related proteins, or isoforms, differing only by small changes in net charge). Four proteins appeared to increase only when the UCD concentration was above a threshold of 16 micrograms l-1.

职业接触镉可能尿蛋白生物标志物的定量二维电泳检测。
为了寻找新的镉毒性尿蛋白生物标志物,我们采用定量双向电泳(2DE)技术,分析了18名镉回收厂男性员工的尿液样本,他们的平均年龄为47 +/- 15.6岁(+/- 1 SD),尿镉水平在0.14 ~ 20.4微克l-1(0.06 ~ 37.1微克g-1肌酐)。对银染色凝胶的图像分析得出每人平均825 +/- 184个尿蛋白(斑点)的强度(浓度)值,并发现每人596 +/- 218个匹配蛋白(两个或更多凝胶中相同的蛋白质)。原子吸收光谱法测定尿总蛋白和各斑点强度之和与尿镉(UCD)呈正相关(P = 0.0447和P = 0.0616)。相对分子质量(M(r))小于40 kDa的所有酸性蛋白的强度总和与UCD相关(P = 0.0461),表明随着UCD的增加,酸性蛋白尿的M(r)较低。通过回归分析与UCD匹配的蛋白强度进行多元假设检验,发现14种未确定的蛋白被认为是镉暴露生物标志物的候选蛋白。M(r)s小于13.9 kDa和相对甘油醛-3-磷酸脱氢酶(G3PDHr)坐标为-19.7和-27.2的两种最佳候选蛋白在2DE凝胶中被很好地分解,其强度在测试的UCD范围内分别增加了323%和857%。另外两种M(r)s分别为23.9 kDa和29.2 kDa且带酸性净电荷的蛋白质没有被很好地分解。六种非常酸性的蛋白质,其M(r)s范围从88.8到90.7 kDa,强度与UCD高度相关,似乎是相关的,并被分解为一个“电荷序列”(一组相关的蛋白质,或同种异构体,只有净电荷的微小变化)。只有当UCD浓度超过16微克-1的阈值时,4种蛋白才出现增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信