Do ambulance crews triage patients.

K Porter
{"title":"Do ambulance crews triage patients.","authors":"K Porter","doi":"10.1136/emj.10.1.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sir I have read with interest the article on paramedic care (Rouse, 1991) and the conclusion that ambulance crews do not triage patients properly and that prehospital care by paramedics may be jeopardizing patient care. Twenty-four per cent of the patients were 'very seriously injured: they had multiple other injuries, vascular compromise, shock and amputations'. It is clear that most of the patients required an intravenous infusion as early as possible, particularly as the mean transit time to hospital was 20min. Intravenous infusion, of course, follows the primary assessment where priority must be given to airway care the maintenance of breathing and arrest of external haemorrhage. Airway care and spinal immobilization are all important time consuming factors and even if a scoop and run policy is adopted the neck must be protected and a clear airway established and maintained. It has been shown in this unit that delayed resuscitation in patients with compound fractures in isolation increases the incidence of complications particularly fat embolism, and I would advocate early oxygen therapy and intravenous infusion. Clearly there must be accepted protocols for the time it takes to set up an intravenous infusion and an analysis in the West Midlands recently of 100 trauma cases (excluding entrapment) in which intravenous infusion was part of stabilizing care revealed a mean on-scene time of 17min. Doctors with experience of pre-hospital care will appreciate the time it takes to satisfactorily stabilize a patient and I would include this time as being part of effective treatment within the 'golden hour'. For instance, a patient with a compound fractured femur needs a full assessment and treatment based on the usual priorities of care and for his fractured femur appropriate dressings, splintage and pain relief, all of which takes time and if the accident is some distance from the hospital and intravenous infusion is necessary. I have never seen a paramedic undertake these measures to the detriment of attending to the greater priorities in care, in particular, airway care, neck care, breathing and circulation and on many occasions I have received patients where minimal treatment, if any, has been given for there limb fractures because of life threatening priorities elsewhere. Based on the clinical information in this paper it would not be unreasonable to come to the conclusions that pre-hospital management by paramedics is enhancing the care as there are no data in this paper to suggest that paramedic intervention is jeopardizing patient survival. Prospective patient audit using more acceptable techniques such as TRISS (Boyd et al., 1987) need to be undertaken before prehospital management by paramedics can be fully evaluated and, in particular, before suggesting that they are jeopardizing patient care.","PeriodicalId":77009,"journal":{"name":"Archives of emergency medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"61-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/emj.10.1.61","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.10.1.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Sir I have read with interest the article on paramedic care (Rouse, 1991) and the conclusion that ambulance crews do not triage patients properly and that prehospital care by paramedics may be jeopardizing patient care. Twenty-four per cent of the patients were 'very seriously injured: they had multiple other injuries, vascular compromise, shock and amputations'. It is clear that most of the patients required an intravenous infusion as early as possible, particularly as the mean transit time to hospital was 20min. Intravenous infusion, of course, follows the primary assessment where priority must be given to airway care the maintenance of breathing and arrest of external haemorrhage. Airway care and spinal immobilization are all important time consuming factors and even if a scoop and run policy is adopted the neck must be protected and a clear airway established and maintained. It has been shown in this unit that delayed resuscitation in patients with compound fractures in isolation increases the incidence of complications particularly fat embolism, and I would advocate early oxygen therapy and intravenous infusion. Clearly there must be accepted protocols for the time it takes to set up an intravenous infusion and an analysis in the West Midlands recently of 100 trauma cases (excluding entrapment) in which intravenous infusion was part of stabilizing care revealed a mean on-scene time of 17min. Doctors with experience of pre-hospital care will appreciate the time it takes to satisfactorily stabilize a patient and I would include this time as being part of effective treatment within the 'golden hour'. For instance, a patient with a compound fractured femur needs a full assessment and treatment based on the usual priorities of care and for his fractured femur appropriate dressings, splintage and pain relief, all of which takes time and if the accident is some distance from the hospital and intravenous infusion is necessary. I have never seen a paramedic undertake these measures to the detriment of attending to the greater priorities in care, in particular, airway care, neck care, breathing and circulation and on many occasions I have received patients where minimal treatment, if any, has been given for there limb fractures because of life threatening priorities elsewhere. Based on the clinical information in this paper it would not be unreasonable to come to the conclusions that pre-hospital management by paramedics is enhancing the care as there are no data in this paper to suggest that paramedic intervention is jeopardizing patient survival. Prospective patient audit using more acceptable techniques such as TRISS (Boyd et al., 1987) need to be undertaken before prehospital management by paramedics can be fully evaluated and, in particular, before suggesting that they are jeopardizing patient care.
救护人员对病人进行分诊吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信