Method for detection of intracellular pH threshold; comparison between subjective observation and regression analysis.

K Iwanaga, M Sakurai, T Minami
{"title":"Method for detection of intracellular pH threshold; comparison between subjective observation and regression analysis.","authors":"K Iwanaga,&nbsp;M Sakurai,&nbsp;T Minami","doi":"10.2114/ahs1983.12.151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study is to examine the objectivity and reproducibility of intracellular pH threshold (pHT) detected by eye (E), and by regression analysis on linear (L), semilog (SL) and log-log (LL) models. Threshold for inorganic phosphate-to-phosphocreatine ratio (PT) was also examined by three regression analysis. Fifteen males volunteered as subjects. They performed wrist flexion in a ramp protocol of 0.14W/min till exhaustion. Throughout the exercise, 31P-MRS was obtained continuously from wrist flexors. Intracellular pH and phosphate compound in the muscle tissue were monitored as minute-by-minute data. In E, three observers determined pHT subjectively as a work rate just before pH decrement. In three regression analysis, pHT was detected as an intersection of a pair of linear regression lines which was selected statistically or subjectively. pHT detected by four methods showed significant reproducibility between each other, although PT did not. These results provide one of the evidences of threshold behavior of change in pH, and a question of existence of PT in contrast to pHT.</p>","PeriodicalId":77409,"journal":{"name":"The Annals of physiological anthropology = Seiri Jinruigaku Kenkyukai kaishi","volume":"12 3","pages":"151-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2114/ahs1983.12.151","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Annals of physiological anthropology = Seiri Jinruigaku Kenkyukai kaishi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2114/ahs1983.12.151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the objectivity and reproducibility of intracellular pH threshold (pHT) detected by eye (E), and by regression analysis on linear (L), semilog (SL) and log-log (LL) models. Threshold for inorganic phosphate-to-phosphocreatine ratio (PT) was also examined by three regression analysis. Fifteen males volunteered as subjects. They performed wrist flexion in a ramp protocol of 0.14W/min till exhaustion. Throughout the exercise, 31P-MRS was obtained continuously from wrist flexors. Intracellular pH and phosphate compound in the muscle tissue were monitored as minute-by-minute data. In E, three observers determined pHT subjectively as a work rate just before pH decrement. In three regression analysis, pHT was detected as an intersection of a pair of linear regression lines which was selected statistically or subjectively. pHT detected by four methods showed significant reproducibility between each other, although PT did not. These results provide one of the evidences of threshold behavior of change in pH, and a question of existence of PT in contrast to pHT.

细胞内pH阈值检测方法;主观观察与回归分析的比较。
本研究的目的是通过线性(L)、半对数(SL)和对数-对数(LL)模型的回归分析,检验眼测细胞内pH阈值(pHT)的客观性和可重复性。无机磷与磷酸肌酸比值(PT)的阈值也通过三次回归分析进行了检验。15名男性自愿成为研究对象。他们以0.14W/min的坡度方案进行手腕屈曲,直到筋疲力尽。在整个运动过程中,从腕屈肌连续获得31P-MRS。以每分钟的数据监测肌肉组织的细胞内pH值和磷酸化合物。在E中,三个观察者主观地将pHT确定为pH下降之前的工作速率。在三个回归分析中,pHT被检测为一对线性回归线的交集,这对线性回归线是统计或主观选择的。四种方法检测的pHT之间具有显著的重复性,而PT之间没有显著的重复性。这些结果为pH值变化的阈值行为提供了证据之一,并提出了与pH值相反的PT存在的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书