The safety of the Esmarch tourniquet.

W C Biehl, J M Morgan, F W Wagner, R A Gabriel
{"title":"The safety of the Esmarch tourniquet.","authors":"W C Biehl,&nbsp;J M Morgan,&nbsp;F W Wagner,&nbsp;R A Gabriel","doi":"10.1177/107110079301400508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of an Esmarch bandage as a tourniquet in surgery has been criticized. Many authors claim that the pressures under the Esmarch are inconsistent and may be extremely high. We have seen few, if any, problems from the use of an Esmarch in surgery of the foot and ankle. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pressures generated under the Esmarch tourniquet in a situation that mimics its clinical application, and to determine whether pressures of appropriate magnitude and consistency are obtained in order to recommend its continued use in surgery. Ten volunteers performed numerous applications of the Esmarch. The number of wraps and the width of the Esmarch bandage used were varied. The Esmarch was applied as it would be for a surgical case. Pressures directly beneath the Esmarch were recorded 8 cm proximal to the distal tip of the medial malleolus. Considering all volunteers and all pressures generated, a 3-in Esmarch applied with three wraps gave a mean pressure (+/- SD) of 225 +/- 46 mm Hg. A 3-in Esmarch applied with four wraps gave a mean pressure of 291 +/- 53 mm Hg. A 4-in Esmarch applied with three wraps gave a mean pressure of 233 +/- 35 mm Hg, and a 4-in Esmarch with four wraps gave a mean pressure of 284 +/- 42 mm Hg. The maximum pressures generated by any individual were as follows: 3-in three wraps, 321 mm Hg; 3-in four wraps, 413 mm Hg; 4-in three wraps, 328 mm Hg; and 4-in four wraps, 380 mm Hg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":77133,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle","volume":"14 5","pages":"278-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/107110079301400508","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079301400508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

The use of an Esmarch bandage as a tourniquet in surgery has been criticized. Many authors claim that the pressures under the Esmarch are inconsistent and may be extremely high. We have seen few, if any, problems from the use of an Esmarch in surgery of the foot and ankle. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pressures generated under the Esmarch tourniquet in a situation that mimics its clinical application, and to determine whether pressures of appropriate magnitude and consistency are obtained in order to recommend its continued use in surgery. Ten volunteers performed numerous applications of the Esmarch. The number of wraps and the width of the Esmarch bandage used were varied. The Esmarch was applied as it would be for a surgical case. Pressures directly beneath the Esmarch were recorded 8 cm proximal to the distal tip of the medial malleolus. Considering all volunteers and all pressures generated, a 3-in Esmarch applied with three wraps gave a mean pressure (+/- SD) of 225 +/- 46 mm Hg. A 3-in Esmarch applied with four wraps gave a mean pressure of 291 +/- 53 mm Hg. A 4-in Esmarch applied with three wraps gave a mean pressure of 233 +/- 35 mm Hg, and a 4-in Esmarch with four wraps gave a mean pressure of 284 +/- 42 mm Hg. The maximum pressures generated by any individual were as follows: 3-in three wraps, 321 mm Hg; 3-in four wraps, 413 mm Hg; 4-in three wraps, 328 mm Hg; and 4-in four wraps, 380 mm Hg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Esmarch止血带的安全性。
在手术中使用Esmarch绷带作为止血带受到了批评。许多作者声称,在Esmarch下的压力是不一致的,可能非常高。在脚部和踝关节的手术中,我们很少看到使用Esmarch带来的问题。本研究的目的是评估Esmarch止血带在模拟其临床应用的情况下产生的压力,并确定是否获得适当的压力大小和一致性,以推荐其在手术中继续使用。10名志愿者对Esmarch进行了多次应用。绷带的数量和Esmarch绷带的宽度各不相同。Esmarch被应用于外科病例。在内踝远端近端8厘米处记录了Esmarch直接下的压力。考虑所有志愿者和压力产生,3 Esmarch应用三个包裹给平均压力(+ / - SD) 225 + / - 46毫米汞柱。3 Esmarch应用四个包裹给平均压力为291 + / - 53毫米汞柱。4 Esmarch应用有三个包裹给平均压力为233 + / - 35毫米汞柱,和一个4 Esmarch有四个包裹给平均压力为284 + / - 42毫米汞柱。任何个人产生的最大压力如下:3三个包装,321毫米汞柱;3-in四包装,413毫米汞柱;4-in三封装,328毫米汞柱;和4-in - 4包装,380毫米汞柱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信