Intraocular pressure response to loteprednol etabonate in known steroid responders.

J D Bartlett, B Horwitz, R Laibovitz, J F Howes
{"title":"Intraocular pressure response to loteprednol etabonate in known steroid responders.","authors":"J D Bartlett,&nbsp;B Horwitz,&nbsp;R Laibovitz,&nbsp;J F Howes","doi":"10.1089/jop.1993.9.157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The continuing development of ophthalmic steroids has resulted in compounds that have a low tendency to raise intraocular pressure (IOP). Preliminary clinical data have suggested that loteprednol etabonate (LE) 0.5% suspension may not elevate IOP while having promise as a potent topical ophthalmic steroid. This study was designed to evaluate the comparative potential of topical LE and prednisolone acetate (PA) to raise IOP in a population of individuals known to be steroid responders. The study used a double-masked, randomized, single eye, crossover design comparing LE 0.5% and PA 1.0%. Subjects instilled 1 drop of the assigned medication 4 times daily while awake, and follow-up examinations occurred on days 14, 28, and 42. Following a washout period of at least 14 days, subjects entered the second phase of the study, which was identical to the first phase, except that subjects received the alternate study medication. The mean IOP in the LE group increased from 17.4mm Hg at baseline to 21.5mm Hg at day 42 (p > 0.05), while in the PA group the mean IOP increased from 18.1mm Hg at baseline to 27.1mm Hg at day 42 (p < 0.05). There were no serious, severe, or clinically significant events in either group, and LE's effect on IOP was differentiable from that of PA. LE has less effect on IOP when compared to the IOP response induced by PA. LE may become a clinically useful ocular steroid with a favorable IOP-safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":16638,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ocular pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/jop.1993.9.157","citationCount":"95","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ocular pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.1993.9.157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 95

Abstract

The continuing development of ophthalmic steroids has resulted in compounds that have a low tendency to raise intraocular pressure (IOP). Preliminary clinical data have suggested that loteprednol etabonate (LE) 0.5% suspension may not elevate IOP while having promise as a potent topical ophthalmic steroid. This study was designed to evaluate the comparative potential of topical LE and prednisolone acetate (PA) to raise IOP in a population of individuals known to be steroid responders. The study used a double-masked, randomized, single eye, crossover design comparing LE 0.5% and PA 1.0%. Subjects instilled 1 drop of the assigned medication 4 times daily while awake, and follow-up examinations occurred on days 14, 28, and 42. Following a washout period of at least 14 days, subjects entered the second phase of the study, which was identical to the first phase, except that subjects received the alternate study medication. The mean IOP in the LE group increased from 17.4mm Hg at baseline to 21.5mm Hg at day 42 (p > 0.05), while in the PA group the mean IOP increased from 18.1mm Hg at baseline to 27.1mm Hg at day 42 (p < 0.05). There were no serious, severe, or clinically significant events in either group, and LE's effect on IOP was differentiable from that of PA. LE has less effect on IOP when compared to the IOP response induced by PA. LE may become a clinically useful ocular steroid with a favorable IOP-safety profile.

已知类固醇应答者对羟戊酸乙酯的眼压反应。
眼用类固醇药物的持续发展导致了眼压升高趋势较低的化合物。初步临床数据表明,0.5%的雷替诺依他巴酸(LE)混悬液可能不会提高IOP,但有望成为一种有效的眼用类固醇。本研究旨在评估外用LE和醋酸泼尼松龙(PA)提高已知类固醇应答人群IOP的比较潜力。本研究采用双盲、随机、单眼交叉设计,比较LE 0.5%和PA 1.0%。受试者在清醒状态下每日滴注1滴指定药物4次,于第14、28和42天进行随访检查。经过至少14天的洗脱期后,受试者进入研究的第二阶段,该阶段与第一阶段相同,只是受试者接受替代研究药物。LE组平均IOP从基线时的17.4mm Hg增加到第42天的21.5mm Hg (p > 0.05),而PA组平均IOP从基线时的18.1mm Hg增加到第42天的27.1mm Hg (p < 0.05)。两组均未出现严重、严重或临床意义重大的事件,LE对IOP的影响与PA的影响是可区分的。与PA诱导的IOP反应相比,LE对IOP的影响较小。LE可能成为临床上有用的眼类固醇,具有良好的眼压安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信