[Value of thrombolytic therapy in deep venous thrombosis].

T Wagner
{"title":"[Value of thrombolytic therapy in deep venous thrombosis].","authors":"T Wagner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thrombolytic therapy in a large number of patients may prevent post-thrombotic symptoms occurring as late consequences of deep vein thrombosis. In clinical studies, streptokinase either in conventional low dose, longterm, intravenous or in repeated intravenous short term ultra high dose regimens, urokinase and recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activators: all these plasminogen activators have been confirmed to successfully restore the patency of veins. As deep vein thrombosis generally extends over longer distances and are mostly older before being diagnosed, a lysing period of a couple of days must be taken into account. On the other hand, deep vein thromboses aged more than 2 weeks generally are no longer amenable to thrombolytic treatment. Due to their lack of short-term and long-term hazards, thromboses of the arms and the lower legs are not regarded an ideal indication for thrombolysis. Up to now, none of the currently available plasminogen activators has demonstrated superiority over the others, neither in respect of efficacy nor safety. With streptokinase intermittent intravenous ultra-high doses success rates of up to 80% (complete plus partial recanalization) can be achieved within a three-day treatment period. For its accompanying increased hazard of fatal pulmonary embolism, however, it is considered to be contraindicated in patients with pelvine thrombosis. Furthermore, contraindications to streptokinase such as streptococcal infections and prior lysis with streptokinase should always be kept in mind. In these cases streptokinase may be substituted by rt-PA, which, however, in the indication of deep vein thrombosis, is still not well documented today.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":23901,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur die gesamte innere Medizin und ihre Grenzgebiete","volume":"48 6-7","pages":"324-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur die gesamte innere Medizin und ihre Grenzgebiete","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thrombolytic therapy in a large number of patients may prevent post-thrombotic symptoms occurring as late consequences of deep vein thrombosis. In clinical studies, streptokinase either in conventional low dose, longterm, intravenous or in repeated intravenous short term ultra high dose regimens, urokinase and recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activators: all these plasminogen activators have been confirmed to successfully restore the patency of veins. As deep vein thrombosis generally extends over longer distances and are mostly older before being diagnosed, a lysing period of a couple of days must be taken into account. On the other hand, deep vein thromboses aged more than 2 weeks generally are no longer amenable to thrombolytic treatment. Due to their lack of short-term and long-term hazards, thromboses of the arms and the lower legs are not regarded an ideal indication for thrombolysis. Up to now, none of the currently available plasminogen activators has demonstrated superiority over the others, neither in respect of efficacy nor safety. With streptokinase intermittent intravenous ultra-high doses success rates of up to 80% (complete plus partial recanalization) can be achieved within a three-day treatment period. For its accompanying increased hazard of fatal pulmonary embolism, however, it is considered to be contraindicated in patients with pelvine thrombosis. Furthermore, contraindications to streptokinase such as streptococcal infections and prior lysis with streptokinase should always be kept in mind. In these cases streptokinase may be substituted by rt-PA, which, however, in the indication of deep vein thrombosis, is still not well documented today.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

【溶栓治疗在深静脉血栓中的价值】。
大量患者的溶栓治疗可以防止血栓后症状作为深静脉血栓形成的晚期后果发生。在临床研究中,无论是常规低剂量、长期、静脉注射还是重复静脉注射短期超高剂量方案中的链激酶、尿激酶和重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂,均被证实能成功恢复静脉通畅。由于深静脉血栓形成通常会延伸较远的距离,而且大多在确诊前年龄较大,因此必须考虑到几天的溶解期。另一方面,年龄超过2周的深静脉血栓通常不再适合溶栓治疗。由于缺乏短期和长期的危害,手臂和小腿的血栓不被认为是溶栓的理想指征。到目前为止,没有一种现有的纤溶酶原激活剂表现出优于其他,无论是在有效性还是安全性方面。使用链激酶间歇性静脉注射超高剂量,可在三天治疗期内实现高达80%的成功率(完全加部分再通)。然而,由于它会增加致死性肺栓塞的危险,它被认为是盆腔血栓患者的禁忌症。此外,应始终牢记链激酶的禁忌症,如链球菌感染和先前的链激酶裂解。在这些情况下,链激酶可以用rt-PA代替,然而,在深静脉血栓形成的适应症中,目前仍没有很好的文献记载。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信