Predicting atypical Pap smear progression: a case-control study.

Family practice research journal Pub Date : 1993-09-01
D Murphree, M J DeHaven
{"title":"Predicting atypical Pap smear progression: a case-control study.","authors":"D Murphree,&nbsp;M J DeHaven","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This case-control study proposed to define risk factors for progression of cervical disease beyond an atypical level, and to explore the possibility of a clinical tool that would aid the clinician in deciding on the need for colposcopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-three hundred (2,300) abnormal Papanicolaou smears were reviewed to identify documented cases of class II Papanicolaou smears that had progressed. Controls were randomly chosen for each case from the remaining pool of available class II Papanicolaou smears that did not progress. Data analyses were conducted to determine the predictive value of information that would be in a patient's chart with respect to progression from class II Papanicolaou smear to a higher level of disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A univariate analysis revealed several significant variables, including age, education, attendance at a public clinic, marital status, notification of Papanicolaou results, and a history of sexually transmitted disease. Next, a multivariate analysis demonstrated that a group of significant variables could not be defined, and only notification of an atypical Papanicolaou smear was significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study's findings suggest that the data available in a patient's medical record are not sufficient to develop a risk assessment scale and provide evidence of the need for continued study in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":77127,"journal":{"name":"Family practice research journal","volume":"13 3","pages":"233-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This case-control study proposed to define risk factors for progression of cervical disease beyond an atypical level, and to explore the possibility of a clinical tool that would aid the clinician in deciding on the need for colposcopy.

Methods: Twenty-three hundred (2,300) abnormal Papanicolaou smears were reviewed to identify documented cases of class II Papanicolaou smears that had progressed. Controls were randomly chosen for each case from the remaining pool of available class II Papanicolaou smears that did not progress. Data analyses were conducted to determine the predictive value of information that would be in a patient's chart with respect to progression from class II Papanicolaou smear to a higher level of disease.

Results: A univariate analysis revealed several significant variables, including age, education, attendance at a public clinic, marital status, notification of Papanicolaou results, and a history of sexually transmitted disease. Next, a multivariate analysis demonstrated that a group of significant variables could not be defined, and only notification of an atypical Papanicolaou smear was significant.

Conclusions: The study's findings suggest that the data available in a patient's medical record are not sufficient to develop a risk assessment scale and provide evidence of the need for continued study in this area.

预测非典型巴氏涂片进展:一项病例对照研究。
目的:本病例对照研究旨在确定宫颈疾病发展到非典型水平的危险因素,并探讨一种临床工具的可能性,以帮助临床医生决定是否需要阴道镜检查。方法:对2300例异常巴氏涂片进行回顾性分析,以确定II类巴氏涂片进展的病例。从剩余可用的未进展的II类巴氏涂片池中随机选择每个病例的对照。进行数据分析,以确定患者图表中有关从II级巴氏涂片到更高级别疾病进展的信息的预测价值。结果:单变量分析揭示了几个重要的变量,包括年龄、教育程度、在公共诊所就诊、婚姻状况、Papanicolaou结果的通知和性传播疾病史。其次,多变量分析表明,一组显著变量无法定义,只有非典型巴氏涂片的通知是显著的。结论:研究结果表明,患者病历中的现有数据不足以制定风险评估量表,并为该领域继续研究的必要性提供证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信