[Proof of alcoholic intoxication in automobile driving by breath alcohol content in Austria from the legal viewpoint].

Blutalkohol Pub Date : 1993-11-01
K Bittmann
{"title":"[Proof of alcoholic intoxication in automobile driving by breath alcohol content in Austria from the legal viewpoint].","authors":"K Bittmann","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Austria, automobile drivers are obligated to undergo a breathalizer test if they are suspected of driving under the influence of alcohol. Drivers cannot be forced to take the test, but if they refuse, their conduct is then dealt with as a violation of civil law and is therefore punishable by law. If the Alcomat test yields an alcohol content of 0.4 ml/l, i.e. relevant amount, the suspect then has the right to demand that a blood test be carried out. If the authorities refuse to give him this test, then the suspect will not be held to have been in excess of the legal alcohol level by the civil authorities in the following proceedings. On the other hand, in a legal criminal proceeding, the suspect will then be found guilty of exceeding the legal alcohol level, if additional evidence--which must be examined by the judge within the framework of the free consideration of evidence (a principle recognized by Austrian law but not, for example, by American law)--suffices to show with relative certainty that the suspect exceeded the alcohol limit as defined in section 81 Z2StGB). If a blood test is completed and the results differ from those of the breathalizer, then the blood test results are used.</p>","PeriodicalId":77045,"journal":{"name":"Blutalkohol","volume":"30 6","pages":"344-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blutalkohol","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Austria, automobile drivers are obligated to undergo a breathalizer test if they are suspected of driving under the influence of alcohol. Drivers cannot be forced to take the test, but if they refuse, their conduct is then dealt with as a violation of civil law and is therefore punishable by law. If the Alcomat test yields an alcohol content of 0.4 ml/l, i.e. relevant amount, the suspect then has the right to demand that a blood test be carried out. If the authorities refuse to give him this test, then the suspect will not be held to have been in excess of the legal alcohol level by the civil authorities in the following proceedings. On the other hand, in a legal criminal proceeding, the suspect will then be found guilty of exceeding the legal alcohol level, if additional evidence--which must be examined by the judge within the framework of the free consideration of evidence (a principle recognized by Austrian law but not, for example, by American law)--suffices to show with relative certainty that the suspect exceeded the alcohol limit as defined in section 81 Z2StGB). If a blood test is completed and the results differ from those of the breathalizer, then the blood test results are used.

[从法律角度看奥地利通过呼气酒精含量证明汽车驾驶中的酒精中毒]。
在奥地利,如果汽车司机被怀疑在酒精影响下驾驶,他们有义务接受呼吸测试。司机不能被强迫参加考试,但如果他们拒绝,他们的行为将被视为违反民法,因此受到法律惩罚。如果Alcomat测试的酒精含量为0.4毫升/升,即相关量,则嫌疑人有权要求进行血液测试。如果当局拒绝对他进行这种测试,那么在随后的诉讼中,民事当局将不会认为嫌疑人的酒精含量超过法定水平。另一方面,在法律刑事诉讼中,如果额外证据————必须由法官在自由审议证据的框架内审查(奥地利法律承认这一原则,但例如美国法律不承认这一原则)————足以相对肯定地表明,嫌疑人超过了Z2StGB第81条规定的酒精限度,则嫌疑人将被判定为酒量超标。如果血液测试完成后,结果与呼吸器的结果不同,则使用血液测试结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信