Audit of patients with chest pain presenting to an accident and emergency department over a 6-month period.

N J Fothergill, M T Hunt, R Touquet
{"title":"Audit of patients with chest pain presenting to an accident and emergency department over a 6-month period.","authors":"N J Fothergill,&nbsp;M T Hunt,&nbsp;R Touquet","doi":"10.1136/emj.10.3.155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The results of a 6-month retrospective audit of patients presenting with chest pain to an accident and emergency (A&E) department to which 46,000 new patients per year present are discussed. The computer diagnostic code assigned to the patients by the A&E doctor, referral rates for second opinion and disposal after assessment in the A&E department are examined, with particular reference to patients who may have had serious cardiac pathology, such as acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or unstable angina. Audit showed that overall 61% of patients with chest pain of all causes were assessed and discharged home by A&E doctors without recourse to second opinion. Of patients thought by the A&E doctors to have chest pain of cardiac origin, who were referred to the duty medical registrar or cardiologist, 88% were admitted. As a result of these findings a policy of more open referral for second opinion was instituted to reduce the likelihood of discharging patients home with serious cardiac pathology. In addition, the clinical problems of AMI and unstable angina are emphasized to all senior house officers early in their educational programme after joining A&E. Published literature on the diagnosis and misdiagnosis of AMI and unstable angina in the A&E department is reviewed. These studies are almost exclusively from North America, and a need for similar work in the U.K. is discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":77009,"journal":{"name":"Archives of emergency medicine","volume":"10 3","pages":"155-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/emj.10.3.155","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.10.3.155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

Abstract

The results of a 6-month retrospective audit of patients presenting with chest pain to an accident and emergency (A&E) department to which 46,000 new patients per year present are discussed. The computer diagnostic code assigned to the patients by the A&E doctor, referral rates for second opinion and disposal after assessment in the A&E department are examined, with particular reference to patients who may have had serious cardiac pathology, such as acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or unstable angina. Audit showed that overall 61% of patients with chest pain of all causes were assessed and discharged home by A&E doctors without recourse to second opinion. Of patients thought by the A&E doctors to have chest pain of cardiac origin, who were referred to the duty medical registrar or cardiologist, 88% were admitted. As a result of these findings a policy of more open referral for second opinion was instituted to reduce the likelihood of discharging patients home with serious cardiac pathology. In addition, the clinical problems of AMI and unstable angina are emphasized to all senior house officers early in their educational programme after joining A&E. Published literature on the diagnosis and misdiagnosis of AMI and unstable angina in the A&E department is reviewed. These studies are almost exclusively from North America, and a need for similar work in the U.K. is discussed.

对6个月来急诊科就诊的胸痛患者进行审计。
对每年有46000名新患者就诊的急诊科胸痛患者进行了为期6个月的回顾性审计。检查由急诊科医生分配给患者的计算机诊断代码,第二意见转诊率和在急诊科评估后的处理,特别是那些可能有严重心脏病理的患者,如急性心肌梗死(AMI)或不稳定型心绞痛。审计显示,在所有原因的胸痛患者中,有61%的患者在没有求助于第二意见的情况下,由A&E医生评估并出院回家。在急诊医生认为有心脏源性胸痛的患者中,有88%的人被转介给值班医疗注册主任或心脏病专家。由于这些发现,制定了一项更开放的第二意见转诊政策,以减少严重心脏病理患者出院回家的可能性。此外,急性心肌梗塞和不稳定型心绞痛的临床问题被强调给所有高级官员在他们加入急症室后的早期教育计划。本文对急性心肌梗塞和不稳定型心绞痛在急诊科的诊断和误诊发表的文献进行综述。这些研究几乎全部来自北美,并讨论了在英国开展类似工作的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信